Co-Designing a Hybrid Virtual Memory Clinic Model for Regional Australia

Dementia is the second leading cause of disease burden in Australia, with regional populations facing limited access to multidisciplinary assessment, leading to delays and poorer outcomes. A hybrid virtual memory clinic (hVMC) combining in-person and virtual assessments is a possible solution. This study aimed to co-design a hVMC model for trialling in regional areas. This cross-sectional qualitative study included four co-design workshops (n = 56) and four interviews with people living with dementia, care partners, clinicians, and administrators. A hVMC model was iteratively developed and refined. Thematic analysis was conducted. The first theme, "we need the right service, right time," describes regional challenges such as delays in assessment, limited specialist availability, and gaps in post-diagnostic support. The second theme, "the virtual memory clinic must be integrated with existing services," highlights the need for a person-centred hybrid model involving in-person visits and collaboration with local providers, fostering relationships and reciprocal capacity building. The third theme, "clarity needed on who virtual assessment would suit," reflects mixed views on eligibility, with general agreement on a cognitive threshold (e.g., Mini-Mental State Examination >20) but uncertainty around its application, suggesting a need for flexibility. Co-design participants also proposed practical features - shared intake, regular in-person assessments, post-diagnostic interventions (e.g., occupational therapy, cognitive programs), and local capacity building - which were iteratively integrated into the model. We present a co-designed hVMC model incorporating key features to support feasibility, access, and continuity of care. The model includes shared intake, quarterly in-person face-to-face assessments, structured post-diagnostic support, and collaboration with local services to build capacity. This model will be tailored to each region and is currently being piloted. Co-designed models must balance stakeholder priorities with implementation feasibility.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dementia
Published
2025-12-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14713012251407437
Primary Topic
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Co-Designing a Hybrid Virtual Memory Clinic Model for Regional Australia

Johannes C. Michaelian, L. Vaccaro, Simone Simonetti, Susan Kurrle et al.
Dementia
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
article

Co-Designing a Hybrid Virtual Memory Clinic Model for Regional Australia

Johannes C. Michaelian, L. Vaccaro, Simone Simonetti, Susan Kurrle, Inga Mehrani, Kate Laver, Sharon L. Naismith, H Brodaty, Dimity Pond, Lee-Fay Low, Tina Whyte-Ball, Jessica Parkhouse
article en

Abstract

Dementia is the second leading cause of disease burden in Australia, with regional populations facing limited access to multidisciplinary assessment, leading to delays and poorer outcomes. A hybrid virtual memory clinic (hVMC) combining in-person and virtual assessments is a possible solution. This study aimed to co-design a hVMC model for trialling in regional areas. This cross-sectional qualitative study included four co-design workshops (n = 56) and four interviews with people living with dementia, care partners, clinicians, and administrators. A hVMC model was iteratively developed and refined. Thematic analysis was conducted. The first theme, "we need the right service, right time," describes regional challenges such as delays in assessment, limited specialist availability, and gaps in post-diagnostic support. The second theme, "the virtual memory clinic must be integrated with existing services," highlights the need for a person-centred hybrid model involving in-person visits and collaboration with local providers, fostering relationships and reciprocal capacity building. The third theme, "clarity needed on who virtual assessment would suit," reflects mixed views on eligibility, with general agreement on a cognitive threshold (e.g., Mini-Mental State Examination >20) but uncertainty around its application, suggesting a need for flexibility. Co-design participants also proposed practical features - shared intake, regular in-person assessments, post-diagnostic interventions (e.g., occupational therapy, cognitive programs), and local capacity building - which were iteratively integrated into the model. We present a co-designed hVMC model incorporating key features to support feasibility, access, and continuity of care. The model includes shared intake, quarterly in-person face-to-face assessments, structured post-diagnostic support, and collaboration with local services to build capacity. This model will be tailored to each region and is currently being piloted. Co-designed models must balance stakeholder priorities with implementation feasibility.

Dementia
The University of Sydney (AU), University of Tasmania (AU), Flinders University (AU), Health Net (US), UNSW Sydney (AU)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.