Characteristics and treatment outcomes of patients with expansile and infiltrative primary mucinous ovarian carcinoma – A 5-year retrospective study at a tertiary government hospital

Abstract BACKGROUND: Primary invasive mucinous epithelial ovarian carcinoma (MOC) is a rare subtype of epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC). According to the 2020 World Health Organization (WHO) classification, the invasive patterns of MOC are classified into two categories: Infiltrative and expansile invasion. Studies examining the relationship between expansile and infiltrative primary MOCs are limited. In our local setting, there are no published studies to determine the impact of classifying primary MOCs between the two subtypes to treatment outcomes. This study, therefore, aims to determine the prevalence of primary MOC subtypes, their clinical and demographic characteristics, and clinical outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study of patients diagnosed with MOCs for a 5-year period from January 2013 to December 2017 in a public end-referral tertiary hospital. A pathological review was conducted using the 2020 WHO classification to determine the pattern of invasion. Demographic data were obtained and the treatment outcome of infiltrative invasion and expansile invasion of ovarian mucinous carcinoma were compared. Log–rank test was used to determine the overall survival (OS) with the specific type of MOCs. RESULTS: A total of 29 cases were included in this study wherein 79.3% were expansile MOC type and 20.7% were infiltrative. Most of the patients had International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Stage IA (27.6%). All patients had laparotomy and half of the patients received adjuvant therapy, 47.8% and 50% in expansile and infiltrative type, respectively. The factors associated with overall mortality were MOC type: expansile, hazard ratio (HR) = 0.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.07–0.91, P = 0.047, and infiltrative, HR = 3.3, 95% CI = 1.1–13.5, P = 0.047. Median OS was significantly higher in patients with expansile compared to infiltrative type (42 vs. 25 months, P = 0.039). CONCLUSION: Infiltrative invasion was observed to be a prognostic factor showing worse outcomes for ovarian mucinous carcinoma compared to expansile invasion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philippine Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Published
2025-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4103/pjog.pjog_51_24
Primary Topic
Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Characteristics and treatment outcomes of patients with expansile and infiltrative primary mucinous ovarian carcinoma – A 5-year retrospective study at a tertiary government hospital

Renee Vina G. Sicam, Joeanne Marie M. Salise, Jonathan P. Rivera, Jay Ian Retuta Argel
Philippine Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology
Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
article

Characteristics and treatment outcomes of patients with expansile and infiltrative primary mucinous ovarian carcinoma – A 5-year retrospective study at a tertiary government hospital

Renee Vina G. Sicam, Joeanne Marie M. Salise, Jonathan P. Rivera, Jay Ian Retuta Argel
article en

Abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND: Primary invasive mucinous epithelial ovarian carcinoma (MOC) is a rare subtype of epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC). According to the 2020 World Health Organization (WHO) classification, the invasive patterns of MOC are classified into two categories: Infiltrative and expansile invasion. Studies examining the relationship between expansile and infiltrative primary MOCs are limited. In our local setting, there are no published studies to determine the impact of classifying primary MOCs between the two subtypes to treatment outcomes. This study, therefore, aims to determine the prevalence of primary MOC subtypes, their clinical and demographic characteristics, and clinical outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective study of patients diagnosed with MOCs for a 5-year period from January 2013 to December 2017 in a public end-referral tertiary hospital. A pathological review was conducted using the 2020 WHO classification to determine the pattern of invasion. Demographic data were obtained and the treatment outcome of infiltrative invasion and expansile invasion of ovarian mucinous carcinoma were compared. Log–rank test was used to determine the overall survival (OS) with the specific type of MOCs. RESULTS: A total of 29 cases were included in this study wherein 79.3% were expansile MOC type and 20.7% were infiltrative. Most of the patients had International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Stage IA (27.6%). All patients had laparotomy and half of the patients received adjuvant therapy, 47.8% and 50% in expansile and infiltrative type, respectively. The factors associated with overall mortality were MOC type: expansile, hazard ratio (HR) = 0.3, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.07–0.91, P = 0.047, and infiltrative, HR = 3.3, 95% CI = 1.1–13.5, P = 0.047. Median OS was significantly higher in patients with expansile compared to infiltrative type (42 vs. 25 months, P = 0.039). CONCLUSION: Infiltrative invasion was observed to be a prognostic factor showing worse outcomes for ovarian mucinous carcinoma compared to expansile invasion.

Philippine Journal of Obstetrics and GynecologyVol. 49(4)
Philippine General Hospital (PH), University of the Philippines Manila (PH)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.