International Legal Standards on Detention Measures and Recommendations for Reforming Vietnamese Criminal Procedure Law

The article examines the extent to which Vietnam’s Criminal Procedure Law on pretrial detention aligns with international legal standards and the practices of selected countries. Based on an analysis of international legal frameworks and a comparative study of the laws and practical applications in Russia, Germany, Japan, and China, the research identifies gaps and shortcomings in Vietnam’s legislation. The findings reveal that, while these countries regard pretrial detention as a last resort, applied cautiously under independent judicial oversight and with priority given to alternative measures, Vietnam’s law still prioritizes detention, applies inflexible time limits, and lacks adequate safeguards for human rights. Accordingly, the article proposes several recommendations: clearly establishing the principle that pretrial detention is a last resort; expanding judicial authority to impose this measure; enhancing procedural transparency and the right to appeal; and codifying alternative measures. These recommendations aim to increase transparency, strengthen human rights protection, and advance Vietnam’s integration into the international legal framework. ướng hội nhập toàn cầu.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
VNU Journal of Science Legal Studies
Published
2025-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25073/2588-1167/vnuls.4751
Primary Topic
Criminal Law and Evidence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

International Legal Standards on Detention Measures and Recommendations for Reforming Vietnamese Criminal Procedure Law

Hoang Tam Phi
VNU Journal of Science Legal Studies
Criminal Law and Evidence
article

International Legal Standards on Detention Measures and Recommendations for Reforming Vietnamese Criminal Procedure Law

Hoang Tam Phi
article en

Abstract

The article examines the extent to which Vietnam’s Criminal Procedure Law on pretrial detention aligns with international legal standards and the practices of selected countries. Based on an analysis of international legal frameworks and a comparative study of the laws and practical applications in Russia, Germany, Japan, and China, the research identifies gaps and shortcomings in Vietnam’s legislation. The findings reveal that, while these countries regard pretrial detention as a last resort, applied cautiously under independent judicial oversight and with priority given to alternative measures, Vietnam’s law still prioritizes detention, applies inflexible time limits, and lacks adequate safeguards for human rights. Accordingly, the article proposes several recommendations: clearly establishing the principle that pretrial detention is a last resort; expanding judicial authority to impose this measure; enhancing procedural transparency and the right to appeal; and codifying alternative measures. These recommendations aim to increase transparency, strengthen human rights protection, and advance Vietnam’s integration into the international legal framework. ướng hội nhập toàn cầu.

VNU Journal of Science Legal StudiesVol. 41(4)
Vascular Birthmarks Foundation (US)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Criminal Law and Evidence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.