Exemption from the Remainder of the Penalty of Limitation of Liberty (Non-Custodial Penalty)

Abstract This article discusses the exemption from the remainder of the penalty of limitation of liberty (non-custodial penalty) under Article 83 of the Penal Code, a legal institution that plays a significant role in criminal policy. It is intended to encourage convicted persons to comply with the law not only during the execution of the penalty but also after exemption, once part of the penalty has been served. However, this objective may not always be achieved due to the absence of additional instruments for influencing the conduct of convicted persons following exemption. The definitive nature of exemption, which precludes any further action in the event of a violation of the legal order by the exempted person, has led to a de lege ferenda proposal to make this institution conditional. The article analyses the purpose and legal nature of exemption, the conditions for its application (serving part of the sentence, compliance with the legal order, fulfilment of obligations imposed on the convicted person, penal measures, compensatory measures, and forfeiture), the sentencing procedure, and the consequences of exemption leading to recognition of the sentence as served.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ius Novum
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2478/in-2025-0033
Primary Topic
Legal Rights and Human Rights
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exemption from the Remainder of the Penalty of Limitation of Liberty (Non-Custodial Penalty)

Blanka Julita Stefańska
Ius Novum
Legal Rights and Human Rights
article

Exemption from the Remainder of the Penalty of Limitation of Liberty (Non-Custodial Penalty)

Blanka Julita Stefańska
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article discusses the exemption from the remainder of the penalty of limitation of liberty (non-custodial penalty) under Article 83 of the Penal Code, a legal institution that plays a significant role in criminal policy. It is intended to encourage convicted persons to comply with the law not only during the execution of the penalty but also after exemption, once part of the penalty has been served. However, this objective may not always be achieved due to the absence of additional instruments for influencing the conduct of convicted persons following exemption. The definitive nature of exemption, which precludes any further action in the event of a violation of the legal order by the exempted person, has led to a de lege ferenda proposal to make this institution conditional. The article analyses the purpose and legal nature of exemption, the conditions for its application (serving part of the sentence, compliance with the legal order, fulfilment of obligations imposed on the convicted person, penal measures, compensatory measures, and forfeiture), the sentencing procedure, and the consequences of exemption leading to recognition of the sentence as served.

Ius NovumVol. 19(4)
Uczelnia Łazarskiego (PL)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Legal Rights and Human Rights
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.