A comparison of mometasone versus triamcinolone-soaked gelfoam in reducing postoperative inflammation and adhesions after functional endoscopic sinus surgery: a randomized controlled trial

Abstract Background Intranasal corticosteroids are widely used following functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) to reduce inflammation and prevent postoperative complications. However, there is limited data directly comparing the efficacy of different corticosteroid preparations delivered via Gelfoam packing. Objectives To compare the postoperative outcomes of mometasone-soaked Gelfoam versus triamcinolone-soaked Gelfoam following FESS. Methods This prospective comparative study included 34 patients undergoing FESS, randomized into two equal groups: the Mometasone group ( n = 17) and the Triamcinolone group ( n = 17). Baseline demographics, clinical history, and operative details were recorded. Postoperative outcomes were assessed on days 6, 12, and 18, with a focus on inflammation scores, adhesion formation, and crusting. Independent t -tests and chi-square tests were used for statistical analysis. Results Baseline characteristics and operative details were comparable between groups ( p > 0.05). At 18 days, both groups showed significantly lower inflammation and adhesion scores on the study side compared with their respective control sides. In the mometasone group, the mean score was 0.76 ± 0.97 on the study side versus 2.24 ± 0.66 on the control side ( p = 0.001). Similarly, in the triamcinolone group, the mean score was 1.29 ± 1.05 on the study side compared with 2.53 ± 0.51 on the control side ( p = 0.001). Comparing both groups, the study side showed that at day 18, the inflammation and adhesion score was lower in the mometasone group but without statistical significance (Day 18: 0.76 ± 0.97 vs. 1.29 ± 1.05, p = 0.119). Conclusion Both mometasone- and triamcinolone-soaked Gelfoam were effective in minimizing postoperative complications after FESS. The within-group comparison showed a significant difference between the study side and the control side in both mometasone and triamcinolone groups. Although the differences were not statistically significant, the mometasone study side showed a trend toward higher effectiveness in lowering inflammation and avoiding adhesion than the triamcinolone study side. Larger, multicenter trials with longer follow-up periods are needed to corroborate these findings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology
Published
2025-12-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s43163-025-00973-6
Primary Topic
Sinusitis and nasal conditions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A comparison of mometasone versus triamcinolone-soaked gelfoam in reducing postoperative inflammation and adhesions after functional endoscopic sinus surgery: a randomized controlled trial

Ahmed Mohamed Elshafei, Mohamed Zekry, Mohamed Mahmoud ElSheikh, Mohamed G. Hamed
The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology
Sinusitis and nasal conditions
article

A comparison of mometasone versus triamcinolone-soaked gelfoam in reducing postoperative inflammation and adhesions after functional endoscopic sinus surgery: a randomized controlled trial

Ahmed Mohamed Elshafei, Mohamed Zekry, Mohamed Mahmoud ElSheikh, Mohamed G. Hamed
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Intranasal corticosteroids are widely used following functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) to reduce inflammation and prevent postoperative complications. However, there is limited data directly comparing the efficacy of different corticosteroid preparations delivered via Gelfoam packing. Objectives To compare the postoperative outcomes of mometasone-soaked Gelfoam versus triamcinolone-soaked Gelfoam following FESS. Methods This prospective comparative study included 34 patients undergoing FESS, randomized into two equal groups: the Mometasone group ( n = 17) and the Triamcinolone group ( n = 17). Baseline demographics, clinical history, and operative details were recorded. Postoperative outcomes were assessed on days 6, 12, and 18, with a focus on inflammation scores, adhesion formation, and crusting. Independent t -tests and chi-square tests were used for statistical analysis. Results Baseline characteristics and operative details were comparable between groups ( p > 0.05). At 18 days, both groups showed significantly lower inflammation and adhesion scores on the study side compared with their respective control sides. In the mometasone group, the mean score was 0.76 ± 0.97 on the study side versus 2.24 ± 0.66 on the control side ( p = 0.001). Similarly, in the triamcinolone group, the mean score was 1.29 ± 1.05 on the study side compared with 2.53 ± 0.51 on the control side ( p = 0.001). Comparing both groups, the study side showed that at day 18, the inflammation and adhesion score was lower in the mometasone group but without statistical significance (Day 18: 0.76 ± 0.97 vs. 1.29 ± 1.05, p = 0.119). Conclusion Both mometasone- and triamcinolone-soaked Gelfoam were effective in minimizing postoperative complications after FESS. The within-group comparison showed a significant difference between the study side and the control side in both mometasone and triamcinolone groups. Although the differences were not statistically significant, the mometasone study side showed a trend toward higher effectiveness in lowering inflammation and avoiding adhesion than the triamcinolone study side. Larger, multicenter trials with longer follow-up periods are needed to corroborate these findings.

The Egyptian Journal of OtolaryngologyVol. 41(1)
Helwan University (EG)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Sinusitis and nasal conditions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.