Evaluation of IFS Model for Tropical Cyclone Forecasting in Vietnam: Track, Intensity, and Rainfall (2018–2022)

This study evaluates the forecasting performance of the Integrated Forecasting System (IFS) model developed by the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) in predicting tropical cyclones (TCs) affecting Vietnam during the period 2018–2022. The assessment focuses on TC track, intensity, and rainfall forecasts, employing best-track data from the Regional Specialized Meteorological Center (RSMC) Tokyo and rainfall observations collected from 186 meteorological stations across Vietnam. The results show that the mean direct position error (DPE) increases with forecast lead time, from 71 km at 24 hours to 118 km at 48 hours and 183 km at 72 hours. A statistically significant downward trend is observed at the 48-hour forecast horizon, indicating improvement in track accuracy. Overall, these errors remain within the acceptable operational thresholds for Vietnam, confirming the model’s applicability for routine forecasting. In terms of TC intensity, forecast errors show limited variation across different lead times, with the mean absolute error (MAE) of Vmax averaging 9 knots (4.63 m/s) and the root mean square error (RMSE) of Vmax averaging 12 knots (6.17 m/s). Both values are consistent with national standards; however, a few cases exhibited substantial deviations, particularly for rapidly intensifying cyclones. For TC-induced rainfall, the IFS model demonstrates the highest skill in forecasting light rainfall (<16 mm) across all lead times, whereas predictive skill declines notably for heavier rainfall categories. At a 72-hour lead time, both the threat score (TS) and the probability of detection (POD) drop below 0.10 for rainfall exceeding 50 mm, underscoring considerable limitations in forecasting heavy and very heavy precipitation events.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Geoinformatics
Published
2025-12-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.52939/ijg.v21i12.4643
Primary Topic
Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluation of IFS Model for Tropical Cyclone Forecasting in Vietnam: Track, Intensity, and Rainfall (2018–2022)

International Journal of Geoinformatics
Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research
article

Evaluation of IFS Model for Tropical Cyclone Forecasting in Vietnam: Track, Intensity, and Rainfall (2018–2022)

article en

Abstract

This study evaluates the forecasting performance of the Integrated Forecasting System (IFS) model developed by the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) in predicting tropical cyclones (TCs) affecting Vietnam during the period 2018–2022. The assessment focuses on TC track, intensity, and rainfall forecasts, employing best-track data from the Regional Specialized Meteorological Center (RSMC) Tokyo and rainfall observations collected from 186 meteorological stations across Vietnam. The results show that the mean direct position error (DPE) increases with forecast lead time, from 71 km at 24 hours to 118 km at 48 hours and 183 km at 72 hours. A statistically significant downward trend is observed at the 48-hour forecast horizon, indicating improvement in track accuracy. Overall, these errors remain within the acceptable operational thresholds for Vietnam, confirming the model’s applicability for routine forecasting. In terms of TC intensity, forecast errors show limited variation across different lead times, with the mean absolute error (MAE) of Vmax averaging 9 knots (4.63 m/s) and the root mean square error (RMSE) of Vmax averaging 12 knots (6.17 m/s). Both values are consistent with national standards; however, a few cases exhibited substantial deviations, particularly for rapidly intensifying cyclones. For TC-induced rainfall, the IFS model demonstrates the highest skill in forecasting light rainfall (<16 mm) across all lead times, whereas predictive skill declines notably for heavier rainfall categories. At a 72-hour lead time, both the threat score (TS) and the probability of detection (POD) drop below 0.10 for rainfall exceeding 50 mm, underscoring considerable limitations in forecasting heavy and very heavy precipitation events.

International Journal of Geoinformatics
Hanoi University of Natural Resources and Environment (VN)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.