Small vegetation biomass retention efficiency across global forests

Live forest biomass is essential in sequestering carbon and supporting ecosystem services. How much of the synthesized biomass ultimately stays in live plant biomass remain elusive. Here we propose a new proxy, biomass retention efficiency (BRE), to measure the efficiency of biosynthesized carbohydrates remained in live plant biomass in forests. Based on satellite measurements and terrestrial ecosystem models, we estimated that globally the median of BRE goes from 0.21% to 2.60%, much smaller than carbon use efficiency and biomass production efficiency (ca. 50%). Across forest types, BREs derived from different datasets exhibit inconsistent patterns. This large differences mainly stems from the inconsistency in quantifying biomass changes across different approaches. This small BRE highlights the importance of tracking the fate of nonliving biomass carbon for better understanding forest carbon sequestration, and the uncertainties emphasize the needs for coordinated effort for future improvements in high-quality large-scale biomass estimation and model-data integration. Only 0.2–2.6% of synthesized biomass stays in live plants at the global scale, as revealed by biomass retention efficiency, a newly developed metric based on satellite data and ecosystem models.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communications Earth & Environment
Published
2025-12-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-025-03138-8
Primary Topic
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Small vegetation biomass retention efficiency across global forests

Xinyu Zou, Tao Feng, Hui Ying Yang, Junzhi Zhou et al.
Communications Earth & Environment
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
article

Small vegetation biomass retention efficiency across global forests

Xinyu Zou, Tao Feng, Hui Ying Yang, Junzhi Zhou, Lanhe Yang, Jiang Zhang, Yuanyuan Huang, Jiameng Chen, Fangli Wei
article en

Abstract

Live forest biomass is essential in sequestering carbon and supporting ecosystem services. How much of the synthesized biomass ultimately stays in live plant biomass remain elusive. Here we propose a new proxy, biomass retention efficiency (BRE), to measure the efficiency of biosynthesized carbohydrates remained in live plant biomass in forests. Based on satellite measurements and terrestrial ecosystem models, we estimated that globally the median of BRE goes from 0.21% to 2.60%, much smaller than carbon use efficiency and biomass production efficiency (ca. 50%). Across forest types, BREs derived from different datasets exhibit inconsistent patterns. This large differences mainly stems from the inconsistency in quantifying biomass changes across different approaches. This small BRE highlights the importance of tracking the fate of nonliving biomass carbon for better understanding forest carbon sequestration, and the uncertainties emphasize the needs for coordinated effort for future improvements in high-quality large-scale biomass estimation and model-data integration. Only 0.2–2.6% of synthesized biomass stays in live plants at the global scale, as revealed by biomass retention efficiency, a newly developed metric based on satellite data and ecosystem models.

Communications Earth & EnvironmentVol. 7(1)
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Peking University (CN), Cornell University (US), China University of Mining and Technology (CN), Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research (CN), University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
Chinese Academy of Sciences, National Key Research and Development Program of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.