Degrees of Rivalry: U.S. Paradiplomacy and the Weaponization of Education Policy against Japan and China

Abstract Both education and subnational governments have been stereotyped as promoting cooperation and soft power in international relations. In 2023, however, the US state of Florida banned many Chinese researchers from its public universities, demonstrating that subnational governments can use educational policies to take hostile stances on international questions. To understand why subnational governments might use their prerogatives in this fashion, I use a multi-method approach to explore how policies restricting international ties may be demanded in a federal system and their potential effects. Survey data show that Americans who view China as a threat substantially favor limiting educational exchanges with China. San Francisco’s 1905–1907 segregation of Japanese students demonstrates how public demand for municipal actions produced a confrontation that strained US relations with a rising foreign power. Two pre-registered survey experiments demonstrate that neither federal disapproval nor Chinese warnings about diplomatic consequences arising from measures like Florida’s significantly reduce public support.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Foreign Policy Analysis
Published
2025-10-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/fpa/oraf038
Primary Topic
Policy Transfer and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Degrees of Rivalry: U.S. Paradiplomacy and the Weaponization of Education Policy against Japan and China

Paul Musgrave
Foreign Policy Analysis
Policy Transfer and Learning
article

Degrees of Rivalry: U.S. Paradiplomacy and the Weaponization of Education Policy against Japan and China

Paul Musgrave
article en

Abstract

Abstract Both education and subnational governments have been stereotyped as promoting cooperation and soft power in international relations. In 2023, however, the US state of Florida banned many Chinese researchers from its public universities, demonstrating that subnational governments can use educational policies to take hostile stances on international questions. To understand why subnational governments might use their prerogatives in this fashion, I use a multi-method approach to explore how policies restricting international ties may be demanded in a federal system and their potential effects. Survey data show that Americans who view China as a threat substantially favor limiting educational exchanges with China. San Francisco’s 1905–1907 segregation of Japanese students demonstrates how public demand for municipal actions produced a confrontation that strained US relations with a rising foreign power. Two pre-registered survey experiments demonstrate that neither federal disapproval nor Chinese warnings about diplomatic consequences arising from measures like Florida’s significantly reduce public support.

Foreign Policy AnalysisVol. 22(1)
Georgetown University in Qatar (QA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Policy Transfer and Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Degrees of Rivalry: U.S. Paradiplomacy and the Weaponization of Education Policy against Japan and China — Paul Musgrave · Foreign Policy Analysis (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS