Differences in characteristics between naturalized threatened plants and other threatened plants

Many non-native plant species introduced by humans have become naturalized. At the same time many species are threatened in their native range. However, the number of plant species threatened in their native range that are naturalized elsewhere remains unknown. So too does the set of characteristics that distinguishes such species from other threatened species. For vascular plant species, we combined information from databases on threat status and naturalization success and information on growth forms, economic uses, and native and non-native ranges to identify plants that are threatened in their native range but naturalized in their non-native range. Among the 26,036 species assessed as threatened by the International Union for Conservation of Nature, only 238 (∼1%) were naturalized elsewhere. Most of the species threatened in their native range that are naturalized elsewhere were trees or shrubs of economic value, for example, for building materials and landscaping. More threatened species than expected were naturalized in Europe, and these include species from nearly all continents. Although Africa was the largest source of species threatened in their native range but naturalized elsewhere in absolute numbers, the numbers were lower than expected due to the continent's overall large number of threatened species. Only a few threatened plant species have become naturalized, and they differed in some of their characteristics, including growth form, native origin, threats, and economic use, from other threatened species.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Conservation Biology
Published
2025-12-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.70201
Primary Topic
Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Differences in characteristics between naturalized threatened plants and other threatened plants

Franz Essl, Jan Pergl, Holger Kreft, Weihan Zhao et al.
Conservation Biology
Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
article

Differences in characteristics between naturalized threatened plants and other threatened plants

Franz Essl, Jan Pergl, Holger Kreft, Weihan Zhao, Mark van Kleunen, Amy J. S. Davis, Trevor S. Fristoe, Patrick Weigelt, Wayne Dawson, Petr Pyšek, Marten Winter
article en

Abstract

Many non-native plant species introduced by humans have become naturalized. At the same time many species are threatened in their native range. However, the number of plant species threatened in their native range that are naturalized elsewhere remains unknown. So too does the set of characteristics that distinguishes such species from other threatened species. For vascular plant species, we combined information from databases on threat status and naturalization success and information on growth forms, economic uses, and native and non-native ranges to identify plants that are threatened in their native range but naturalized in their non-native range. Among the 26,036 species assessed as threatened by the International Union for Conservation of Nature, only 238 (∼1%) were naturalized elsewhere. Most of the species threatened in their native range that are naturalized elsewhere were trees or shrubs of economic value, for example, for building materials and landscaping. More threatened species than expected were naturalized in Europe, and these include species from nearly all continents. Although Africa was the largest source of species threatened in their native range but naturalized elsewhere in absolute numbers, the numbers were lower than expected due to the continent's overall large number of threatened species. Only a few threatened plant species have become naturalized, and they differed in some of their characteristics, including growth form, native origin, threats, and economic use, from other threatened species.

Conservation Biology
University of Vienna (AT), University of Liverpool (GB), University of Puerto Rico at Río Piedras (PR), University of Konstanz (DE), Charles University (CZ), German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (DE), Max Planck Institute of Animal Behavior (DE), Czech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Botany (CZ), University of Göttingen (DE), Taizhou University (CN), Leipzig University (DE)
International Max Planck Research School for Environmental, Cellular and Molecular Microbiology, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Grantová Agentura České Republiky, Austrian Science Fund, Akademie Věd České Republiky, China Scholarship Council, Deutsches Zentrum für integrative Biodiversitätsforschung Halle-Jena-Leipzig
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.