Comparison of complex-contrast versus French contrast training on steroid hormones and physical performance of tier 3 male field hockey players: A randomized controlled trial

As a high-intensity, intermittent sport, field hockey demands optimal muscular power, speed, agility, and hormonal readiness to sustain competitive performance. This randomized controlled trial compared the effects of Complex-Contrast Training (CCT) and French Contrast Training (FCT) on steroid hormone responses and selected physical performance parameters in tier 3 male field hockey players. Forty-five players (age: 19.56 ± 1.34 years) were randomly assigned to either a CCT group ( n = 15), an FCT group ( n = 15), or a regular training group (RTG) ( n = 15). Training interventions were conducted thrice weekly for 12 weeks (36 sessions total), each lasting 60 min, following a 2-week familiarization period. Baseline assessment (A1) and 12-week assessment (A2) included serum testosterone (TST) and cortisol (CRSL) concentrations, 50 m sprint time, change of direction speed (CoDs), and countermovement jump (CMJ). Both CCT and FCT groups demonstrated significant improvements in sprint performance ( p < 0.001, ⴄ 2 =0.066), and CoDs ( p < 0.001, ⴄ 2 =0.117), and CMJ ( p < 0.001, ⴄ 2 =0.133), compared to the RTG. TST levels increased significantly in both CCT and FCT ( p < 0.001, ⴄ 2 =0.094), with a greater effect observed in the FCT group. CRSL responses indicated a favorable anabolic-catabolic balance post-training ( p < 0.001, ⴄ 2 =0.056), particularly in the FCT group. Between-group comparisons revealed that FCT produced superior gains in explosive power and hormonal adaptation, while CCT yielded slightly better improvements in sprint performance. These findings suggest that both training methods are effective for enhancing steroid hormone profiles and performance variables in competitive field hockey players, with FCT offering a marginal advantage for power-oriented adaptations. Coaches and practitioners may consider incorporating either approach during pre-competition phases to optimize physiological and performance outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Apunts Sports Medicine
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apunsm.2025.100508
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of complex-contrast versus French contrast training on steroid hormones and physical performance of tier 3 male field hockey players: A randomized controlled trial

Ibnu Noufal Kambitta Valappil, Gavoutamane Vasanthi, Elayaraja Masilamani
Apunts Sports Medicine
Sports Performance and Training
article

Comparison of complex-contrast versus French contrast training on steroid hormones and physical performance of tier 3 male field hockey players: A randomized controlled trial

Ibnu Noufal Kambitta Valappil, Gavoutamane Vasanthi, Elayaraja Masilamani
article en

Abstract

As a high-intensity, intermittent sport, field hockey demands optimal muscular power, speed, agility, and hormonal readiness to sustain competitive performance. This randomized controlled trial compared the effects of Complex-Contrast Training (CCT) and French Contrast Training (FCT) on steroid hormone responses and selected physical performance parameters in tier 3 male field hockey players. Forty-five players (age: 19.56 ± 1.34 years) were randomly assigned to either a CCT group ( n = 15), an FCT group ( n = 15), or a regular training group (RTG) ( n = 15). Training interventions were conducted thrice weekly for 12 weeks (36 sessions total), each lasting 60 min, following a 2-week familiarization period. Baseline assessment (A1) and 12-week assessment (A2) included serum testosterone (TST) and cortisol (CRSL) concentrations, 50 m sprint time, change of direction speed (CoDs), and countermovement jump (CMJ). Both CCT and FCT groups demonstrated significant improvements in sprint performance ( p < 0.001, ⴄ 2 =0.066), and CoDs ( p < 0.001, ⴄ 2 =0.117), and CMJ ( p < 0.001, ⴄ 2 =0.133), compared to the RTG. TST levels increased significantly in both CCT and FCT ( p < 0.001, ⴄ 2 =0.094), with a greater effect observed in the FCT group. CRSL responses indicated a favorable anabolic-catabolic balance post-training ( p < 0.001, ⴄ 2 =0.056), particularly in the FCT group. Between-group comparisons revealed that FCT produced superior gains in explosive power and hormonal adaptation, while CCT yielded slightly better improvements in sprint performance. These findings suggest that both training methods are effective for enhancing steroid hormone profiles and performance variables in competitive field hockey players, with FCT offering a marginal advantage for power-oriented adaptations. Coaches and practitioners may consider incorporating either approach during pre-competition phases to optimize physiological and performance outcomes.

Apunts Sports Medicine
Pondicherry University (IN), Department of Higher Education (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.