Facilitating engagement: Individual meaning-making and relationship-based trust in women’s experiences of cervical screening

Cervical screening rates in the UK are declining. While previous research has identified barriers to screening uptake, less is known about why many women attend cervical screening despite these barriers. This qualitative study explores factors influencing cervical screening decision-making. Through reflexive thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews (<i>n</i> = 44), two overall themes were developed: Perceived purpose of Screening and Experience of Screening. The analysis indicates that beliefs are central to decision-making and relate to individual meaning-making in relation to knowledge and information. The same information may be interpreted differently by different women and therefore impact cervical screening decision-making in different ways. Women associate cervical screening with pain, embarrassment and potential violation, but many choose to attend despite this. Trust, person-centred care and continuity of care are important for mitigating these negative perceptions and experiences. Implications of findings are discussed and include moving beyond knowledge-based public health interventions for enhancing cervical screening uptake.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Health Psychology
Published
2025-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13591053251400069
Primary Topic
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Facilitating engagement: Individual meaning-making and relationship-based trust in women’s experiences of cervical screening

Rose Rickford, Abigail Halliday, Susanna Kola-Palmer, Lucy Wearmouth et al.
Journal of Health Psychology
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
article

Facilitating engagement: Individual meaning-making and relationship-based trust in women’s experiences of cervical screening

Rose Rickford, Abigail Halliday, Susanna Kola-Palmer, Lucy Wearmouth, Melanie Rogers, Rebecca Gunn
article en

Abstract

Cervical screening rates in the UK are declining. While previous research has identified barriers to screening uptake, less is known about why many women attend cervical screening despite these barriers. This qualitative study explores factors influencing cervical screening decision-making. Through reflexive thematic analysis of semi-structured interviews (<i>n</i> = 44), two overall themes were developed: Perceived purpose of Screening and Experience of Screening. The analysis indicates that beliefs are central to decision-making and relate to individual meaning-making in relation to knowledge and information. The same information may be interpreted differently by different women and therefore impact cervical screening decision-making in different ways. Women associate cervical screening with pain, embarrassment and potential violation, but many choose to attend despite this. Trust, person-centred care and continuity of care are important for mitigating these negative perceptions and experiences. Implications of findings are discussed and include moving beyond knowledge-based public health interventions for enhancing cervical screening uptake.

Journal of Health Psychology
University of Huddersfield (GB), Kirklees College (GB), University of Surrey (GB), Arden University (GB)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Cervical Cancer and HPV Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.