Improving the Large‐Scale Creative Thinking Assessments: A Sociocultural View

ABSTRACT The purpose of this paper is to use the Six A's model of creativity (namely actor, aim, action, artifact, audience, and affordance) to examine the strengths and weaknesses of the PISA 2022 creative thinking (CT) assessment and offer suggestions for improving the testing program. The authors point out that student CT in the PISA context is conceptualized as a specific type of creativity. It is PISA's aim that determines who the creative actors are, how the students engage in CT processes, and how the creative outcomes are presented. Based on the analysis of PISA 2022 methodology and results, we propose a series of suggestions for enhancing the PISA CT competencies and revising the relational test items, as well as how to use the PISA data to conduct secondary analysis. The issue of the gender gap in CT performance is also discussed from the perspective of environmental affordances.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Creative Behavior
Published
2025-12-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.70090
Primary Topic
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Improving the Large‐Scale Creative Thinking Assessments: A Sociocultural View

Jonathan A. Plucker, Weiguo Pang
The Journal of Creative Behavior
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
article

Improving the Large‐Scale Creative Thinking Assessments: A Sociocultural View

Jonathan A. Plucker, Weiguo Pang
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The purpose of this paper is to use the Six A's model of creativity (namely actor, aim, action, artifact, audience, and affordance) to examine the strengths and weaknesses of the PISA 2022 creative thinking (CT) assessment and offer suggestions for improving the testing program. The authors point out that student CT in the PISA context is conceptualized as a specific type of creativity. It is PISA's aim that determines who the creative actors are, how the students engage in CT processes, and how the creative outcomes are presented. Based on the analysis of PISA 2022 methodology and results, we propose a series of suggestions for enhancing the PISA CT competencies and revising the relational test items, as well as how to use the PISA data to conduct secondary analysis. The issue of the gender gap in CT performance is also discussed from the perspective of environmental affordances.

The Journal of Creative BehaviorVol. 60(1)
Johns Hopkins University (US), East China Normal University (CN)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.