Affective polarization and institutional confidence in Canada

Confidence in political institutions has reportedly been in decline over the past 40 years. Yet there is heterogeneity in how this phenomenon has manifested across countries, political institutions and people with different partisan commitments. The increasing antagonism towards opposition partisans – known as affective polarization – may hasten this decline, undermining types of institutional confidence that were perceived to be more durable. This article investigates the effects of affective polarization across non-partisan institutions in Canada. We contend that stronger levels of affective polarization that produce lower levels of trust in partisan institutions may spill over to other non-partisan institutions because polarized individuals may perceive all institutions as reflecting government priorities. Using data from the 2004–2021 Canada Election Studies, we find evidence that spillover is happening to some degree, but that these effects are driven by specific party dynamics and government/opposition status. Although those who support the opposition party report less confidence in non-partisan institutions than government supporters across both main parties, Conservatives who are affectively polarized have lower institutional trust overall, regardless of whether their party is in government or opposition.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Political Science Review
Published
2025-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/01925121251388296
Primary Topic
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Affective polarization and institutional confidence in Canada

Laura B. Stephenson, Andrea Lawlor
International Political Science Review
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
article

Affective polarization and institutional confidence in Canada

Laura B. Stephenson, Andrea Lawlor
article en

Abstract

Confidence in political institutions has reportedly been in decline over the past 40 years. Yet there is heterogeneity in how this phenomenon has manifested across countries, political institutions and people with different partisan commitments. The increasing antagonism towards opposition partisans – known as affective polarization – may hasten this decline, undermining types of institutional confidence that were perceived to be more durable. This article investigates the effects of affective polarization across non-partisan institutions in Canada. We contend that stronger levels of affective polarization that produce lower levels of trust in partisan institutions may spill over to other non-partisan institutions because polarized individuals may perceive all institutions as reflecting government priorities. Using data from the 2004–2021 Canada Election Studies, we find evidence that spillover is happening to some degree, but that these effects are driven by specific party dynamics and government/opposition status. Although those who support the opposition party report less confidence in non-partisan institutions than government supporters across both main parties, Conservatives who are affectively polarized have lower institutional trust overall, regardless of whether their party is in government or opposition.

International Political Science Review
Western University (CA), McMaster University (CA)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Electoral Systems and Political Participation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.