Gender and Narrative Writing in Elementary Schools: A Qualitative Study Supporting Inclusive Education

<ns3:p>Background This study investigates gender differences in narrative writing among primary school students to promote inclusive education, as narrative writing not only demonstrates technical skills but also reflects embedded social and cultural gender norms that can influence the development of literacy and equity in classroom practice. By examining these differences, this study aims to highlight how gender stereotypes can marginalize certain narrative styles and inform pedagogical strategies to foster diverse voices in Indonesian primary schools. Methods A qualitative case study approach was used, which involved the analysis of 33 handwritten narrative documents from fifth graders (12 boys, 21 girls) in Indonesian primary schools, along with semi-structured interviews conducted with 10 selected students (5 boys, 5 girls) to explore their writing process and perceptions of gender norms. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis, focusing on key dimensions such as content, organization, language use, and writing conventions; Ethical consent was obtained from the institutional review body of Universitas Buana Perjuangan (062/LPPM/UBP/2025), and informed consent was obtained in writing from parents/guardians, with verbal consent from child participants. Results The results revealed that male students’ narratives were predominantly action-oriented and linear, emphasizing independence, physical activity, and limited emotional depth, aligned with traditional masculinity norms, while female students produced stories rich in emotional expression, interpersonal relationships, and detailed settings, reflecting a more reflective and relational style associated with feminine norms; Women also show higher proficiency in organizational and writing conventions, achieving better cohesion and technical accuracy, although both genders exhibit technical errors that sometimes obscure the expressive power of their writing, revealing how gender bias can underestimate diverse forms of narrative. Conclusions These findings underscore how gender stereotypes shape literacy practices, which have the potential to perpetuate inequalities in education, and recommend the implementation of gender-sensitive assessment rubrics, cross-gender collaborative writing exercises, and teacher training on critical literacy to support an inclusive environment that validates authentic student voices and promotes equity, contributing to broader gender studies and inclusive education policies in Indonesia and Surrounding.</ns3:p>

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
F1000Research
Published
2025-11-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.171604.1
Primary Topic
Writing and Handwriting Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gender and Narrative Writing in Elementary Schools: A Qualitative Study Supporting Inclusive Education

Dadang Sunendar, Isah Cahyani Cahyani, Sri Wulan Anggraeni
F1000Research
Writing and Handwriting Education
article

Gender and Narrative Writing in Elementary Schools: A Qualitative Study Supporting Inclusive Education

Dadang Sunendar, Isah Cahyani Cahyani, Sri Wulan Anggraeni
article en

Abstract

<ns3:p>Background This study investigates gender differences in narrative writing among primary school students to promote inclusive education, as narrative writing not only demonstrates technical skills but also reflects embedded social and cultural gender norms that can influence the development of literacy and equity in classroom practice. By examining these differences, this study aims to highlight how gender stereotypes can marginalize certain narrative styles and inform pedagogical strategies to foster diverse voices in Indonesian primary schools. Methods A qualitative case study approach was used, which involved the analysis of 33 handwritten narrative documents from fifth graders (12 boys, 21 girls) in Indonesian primary schools, along with semi-structured interviews conducted with 10 selected students (5 boys, 5 girls) to explore their writing process and perceptions of gender norms. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis, focusing on key dimensions such as content, organization, language use, and writing conventions; Ethical consent was obtained from the institutional review body of Universitas Buana Perjuangan (062/LPPM/UBP/2025), and informed consent was obtained in writing from parents/guardians, with verbal consent from child participants. Results The results revealed that male students’ narratives were predominantly action-oriented and linear, emphasizing independence, physical activity, and limited emotional depth, aligned with traditional masculinity norms, while female students produced stories rich in emotional expression, interpersonal relationships, and detailed settings, reflecting a more reflective and relational style associated with feminine norms; Women also show higher proficiency in organizational and writing conventions, achieving better cohesion and technical accuracy, although both genders exhibit technical errors that sometimes obscure the expressive power of their writing, revealing how gender bias can underestimate diverse forms of narrative. Conclusions These findings underscore how gender stereotypes shape literacy practices, which have the potential to perpetuate inequalities in education, and recommend the implementation of gender-sensitive assessment rubrics, cross-gender collaborative writing exercises, and teacher training on critical literacy to support an inclusive environment that validates authentic student voices and promotes equity, contributing to broader gender studies and inclusive education policies in Indonesia and Surrounding.</ns3:p>

F1000ResearchVol. 14
Indonesia University of Education (ID), University of Singaperbangsa Karawang (ID)
Lembaga Pengelola Dana Pendidikan
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Writing and Handwriting Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.