Citing with care: citational politics, the communication canon and the responsibility of scholarly acknowledgment

Abstract This article explores citational politics as a practice that actively constructs and sustains the communication canon. It contends that citation is not a neutral academic formality, but a political and ethical act that shapes whose scholarship becomes visible, legitimate and foundational. Drawing from critical race, feminist and decolonial perspectives, the article highlights the systemic exclusion of Black women, the least cited group in academia, and interrogates how this erasure impoverishes the field. It also identifies patterns of exclusion, from disciplinary bias to technological barriers, that limit the discoverability of Black women’s scholarship. Building on initiatives like #CommunicationSoWhite and #CiteBlackWomen, the article urges communication scholars to adopt more inclusive and reflexive citation practices. It concludes that dismantling exclusionary canons requires both individual responsibility and collective structural change, ultimately reshaping the discipline’s intellectual DNA toward equity and epistemic justice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Communication Culture and Critique
Published
2025-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ccc/tcaf042
Primary Topic
Media Studies and Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Citing with care: citational politics, the communication canon and the responsibility of scholarly acknowledgment

Kim Fox
Communication Culture and Critique
Media Studies and Communication
article

Citing with care: citational politics, the communication canon and the responsibility of scholarly acknowledgment

Kim Fox
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article explores citational politics as a practice that actively constructs and sustains the communication canon. It contends that citation is not a neutral academic formality, but a political and ethical act that shapes whose scholarship becomes visible, legitimate and foundational. Drawing from critical race, feminist and decolonial perspectives, the article highlights the systemic exclusion of Black women, the least cited group in academia, and interrogates how this erasure impoverishes the field. It also identifies patterns of exclusion, from disciplinary bias to technological barriers, that limit the discoverability of Black women’s scholarship. Building on initiatives like #CommunicationSoWhite and #CiteBlackWomen, the article urges communication scholars to adopt more inclusive and reflexive citation practices. It concludes that dismantling exclusionary canons requires both individual responsibility and collective structural change, ultimately reshaping the discipline’s intellectual DNA toward equity and epistemic justice.

Communication Culture and CritiqueVol. 18(4)
American University in Cairo (EG)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Media Studies and Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.