From automation to agentic artificial intelligence in laboratory medicine: an opinion of the IFCC Division on Emerging Technologies

Agentic artificial intelligence (AI) systems are distinguished by their ability to invoke multiple tools, compose command chains, and combine chain-of-thought reasoning with deep research to execute complex tasks and take actions. This represents a major evolution beyond machine learning and large language models (LLM), toward systems capable of planning, executing, and coordinating complex workflows. In contrast to traditional LLMs, which primarily focus on generating and classifying information, agentic AI introduces elements of autonomy, reasoning, and orchestration, while digital twins extend this concept to dynamic virtual representations of patients and laboratory processes, capable of continuous learning, simulation and adaptation. This transition has profound implications for laboratory medicine, a field characterized by high data complexity, multi-omics integration, and stringent operational demands. At the same time, laboratories face growing expectations regarding efficiency, resource stewardship, and value-based healthcare delivery. This article explores both the opportunities and limitations of agentic AI in laboratory medicine, highlighting its potential to move beyond static automation toward autonomous, outcome-driven innovation. It also examines the ethical, interpretability, and governance considerations that must accompany its implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
Published
2025-12-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/cclm-2025-1314
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From automation to agentic artificial intelligence in laboratory medicine: an opinion of the IFCC Division on Emerging Technologies

Ronda F. Greaves, Sven Ebert, Bernard Gouget, D. Gruson et al.
Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

From automation to agentic artificial intelligence in laboratory medicine: an opinion of the IFCC Division on Emerging Technologies

Ronda F. Greaves, Sven Ebert, Bernard Gouget, D. Gruson, Yan Liu, Shah Sm, He Sarina Yang, Woochang Lee
article en

Abstract

Agentic artificial intelligence (AI) systems are distinguished by their ability to invoke multiple tools, compose command chains, and combine chain-of-thought reasoning with deep research to execute complex tasks and take actions. This represents a major evolution beyond machine learning and large language models (LLM), toward systems capable of planning, executing, and coordinating complex workflows. In contrast to traditional LLMs, which primarily focus on generating and classifying information, agentic AI introduces elements of autonomy, reasoning, and orchestration, while digital twins extend this concept to dynamic virtual representations of patients and laboratory processes, capable of continuous learning, simulation and adaptation. This transition has profound implications for laboratory medicine, a field characterized by high data complexity, multi-omics integration, and stringent operational demands. At the same time, laboratories face growing expectations regarding efficiency, resource stewardship, and value-based healthcare delivery. This article explores both the opportunities and limitations of agentic AI in laboratory medicine, highlighting its potential to move beyond static automation toward autonomous, outcome-driven innovation. It also examines the ethical, interpretability, and governance considerations that must accompany its implementation.

Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM)
Ulsan College (KR), Roche (Switzerland) (CH), Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc (BE), The University of Melbourne (AU), Cornell University (US), P. D. Hinduja Hospital and Medical Research Centre (IN), Asan Medical Center (KR), University of Ulsan (KR), Victorian Clinical Genetics Services (AU), Ministry of Health (MN), Murdoch Children's Research Institute (AU), Mindray (China) (CN), Artificial Intelligence in Medicine (Canada) (CA), UCLouvain (BE)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.