Assessing the Predictive Value of D-dimer in Acute Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Introduction: Acute Pancreatitis (AP) often leads to multi-organ dysfunction with high morbidity and mortality necessitating early identification for optimal management. Traditional severity scores have limitations, prompting exploration of biomarkers like D-dimer. Aim: To evaluate D-dimer’s accuracy as a severity marker in AP when compared to theother biomarkers. Materials and Methods: The present comprehensive search was conducted on multiple databases. The authors included randomised clinical trials, cohort, cross-sectional, and casecontrol studies with adults diagnosed with AP and D-dimer measurements. Non-human studies, case reports, and nonEnglish articles were excluded. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Data were analysed with R software focusing on diagnostic accuracy. Results: Nineteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Most were retrospective with predominantly male participants. The pooled sensitivity for D-dimer in identifying Severe AP (SAP) was 0.85 (95% CI: 0.78-0.91), and specificity was 0.58 (95% CI: 0.31-0.85). The AUC for diagnostic accuracy was 0.75 (95% CI: 0.66-0.83). For severity assessment, sensitivity was 0.77 (95% CI: 0.71-0.83), specificity was 0.75 (95% CI: 0.67- 0.83), and AUC was 0.78 (95% CI: 0.73-0.83). D-dimer had 0.86 sensitivity for organ failure detection (AUC 0.72, 95% CI: 0.63-0.81). Conclusion: D-dimer shows moderate-to-high accuracy in identifying SAP and predicting organ failure. It is a promising, cost-effective, and easily accessible biomarker for early severity assessment. Further research is needed to confirm its clinical role and integration into severity models.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH
Published
2025-12-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.7860/jcdr/2026/79868.22484
Primary Topic
Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing the Predictive Value of D-dimer in Acute Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Ahmed Alsaiari, Muhannad Alhamrani
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH
Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
article

Assessing the Predictive Value of D-dimer in Acute Pancreatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Ahmed Alsaiari, Muhannad Alhamrani
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Acute Pancreatitis (AP) often leads to multi-organ dysfunction with high morbidity and mortality necessitating early identification for optimal management. Traditional severity scores have limitations, prompting exploration of biomarkers like D-dimer. Aim: To evaluate D-dimer’s accuracy as a severity marker in AP when compared to theother biomarkers. Materials and Methods: The present comprehensive search was conducted on multiple databases. The authors included randomised clinical trials, cohort, cross-sectional, and casecontrol studies with adults diagnosed with AP and D-dimer measurements. Non-human studies, case reports, and nonEnglish articles were excluded. Risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Data were analysed with R software focusing on diagnostic accuracy. Results: Nineteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Most were retrospective with predominantly male participants. The pooled sensitivity for D-dimer in identifying Severe AP (SAP) was 0.85 (95% CI: 0.78-0.91), and specificity was 0.58 (95% CI: 0.31-0.85). The AUC for diagnostic accuracy was 0.75 (95% CI: 0.66-0.83). For severity assessment, sensitivity was 0.77 (95% CI: 0.71-0.83), specificity was 0.75 (95% CI: 0.67- 0.83), and AUC was 0.78 (95% CI: 0.73-0.83). D-dimer had 0.86 sensitivity for organ failure detection (AUC 0.72, 95% CI: 0.63-0.81). Conclusion: D-dimer shows moderate-to-high accuracy in identifying SAP and predicting organ failure. It is a promising, cost-effective, and easily accessible biomarker for early severity assessment. Further research is needed to confirm its clinical role and integration into severity models.

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.