Subset selection based fusion for biomedical information retrieval tasks

To improve the effectiveness and efficiency of biomedical information retrieval by proposing ranking-based methods for selecting an optimal subset of retrieval systems for data fusion, we propose three ranking-based subset selection methods SFS (Sequential Forward Search), D&P (Diversity & Performance), and P&D (Performance & Diversity). These methods were applied in combination with the Reciprocal Rank Fusion technique. Experiments were conducted on four medical datasets from TREC, using between 62 and 125 candidate retrieval systems, and selecting up to 15 for fusion. The proposed subset selection methods significantly improved retrieval performance. Fusing the selected systems using RRF yielded improvements ranging from 10% to over 60% compared to the best individual retrieval system across the datasets. They also outperform the state-of-the-art technology by a large margin. In summary, our subset selection approach offers a practical and cost-efficient solution for biomedical information retrieval, achieving substantial performance gains while reducing computational overhead.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Research Portal (King's College London)
Published
2025-12-09
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-025-06313-y_reference.pdf
Primary Topic
Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Subset selection based fusion for biomedical information retrieval tasks

C.D. Nugent, Jiahui Sun, Hu Lü, shengli wu et al.
Research Portal (King's College London)
Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
article

Subset selection based fusion for biomedical information retrieval tasks

C.D. Nugent, Jiahui Sun, Hu Lü, shengli wu, Xiangjun Shen
article en

Abstract

To improve the effectiveness and efficiency of biomedical information retrieval by proposing ranking-based methods for selecting an optimal subset of retrieval systems for data fusion, we propose three ranking-based subset selection methods SFS (Sequential Forward Search), D&P (Diversity & Performance), and P&D (Performance & Diversity). These methods were applied in combination with the Reciprocal Rank Fusion technique. Experiments were conducted on four medical datasets from TREC, using between 62 and 125 candidate retrieval systems, and selecting up to 15 for fusion. The proposed subset selection methods significantly improved retrieval performance. Fusing the selected systems using RRF yielded improvements ranging from 10% to over 60% compared to the best individual retrieval system across the datasets. They also outperform the state-of-the-art technology by a large margin. In summary, our subset selection approach offers a practical and cost-efficient solution for biomedical information retrieval, achieving substantial performance gains while reducing computational overhead.

Research Portal (King's College London)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Subset selection based fusion for biomedical information retrieval tasks — C.D. Nugent, Jiahui Sun, et al. · Research Portal (King's College London) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS