Access to the disciplinary file of an academic teacher

Abstract The article is of a scientific and research-based nature. It analyses the transparency of disciplinary proceedings against academic teachers, which are conducted under the Act on Higher Education and Science. The article examines issues of transparency in light of the provisions of that Act, the Code of Criminal Procedure, and the Act on Access to Public Information. The research objective was clear: to determine whether persons not involved in disciplinary proceedings (namely the accused, their defence counsel, or the disciplinary advocate) may request access to the records of such proceedings (in whole or in part), or seek information from them other than official documents, under the Act on Access to Public Information. The analysis covered the regulations concerning the parties to disciplinary proceedings contained in the Higher Education and Science Act, the 2022 Implementing Regulation governing disciplinary procedures, and the Code provisions applicable to disciplinary matters. The rules concerning access to public information were also analysed, both in normative terms and in light of administrative court rulings. The research employed the dogmatic method, and its findings are original and significant for both legal scholarship and practice. The study has conclusively demonstrated that information from disciplinary proceedings involving academic teachers, as well as the files of such proceedings, although considered public information, are not subject to disclosure to persons requesting access under the Act on Access to Public Information. This is because a special regulation – namely the appropriate application, under Article 305 of the Higher Education and Science Act, of Article 156 § 1 of that Code – excludes such applicants, until the conclusion of the disciplinary proceedings, from the group of persons who, under the current legal framework, have access to disciplinary files.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ius Novum
Published
2025-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2478/in-2025-0036
Primary Topic
Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Access to the disciplinary file of an academic teacher

Hanna Paluszkiewicz
Ius Novum
Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies
article

Access to the disciplinary file of an academic teacher

Hanna Paluszkiewicz
article en

Abstract

Abstract The article is of a scientific and research-based nature. It analyses the transparency of disciplinary proceedings against academic teachers, which are conducted under the Act on Higher Education and Science. The article examines issues of transparency in light of the provisions of that Act, the Code of Criminal Procedure, and the Act on Access to Public Information. The research objective was clear: to determine whether persons not involved in disciplinary proceedings (namely the accused, their defence counsel, or the disciplinary advocate) may request access to the records of such proceedings (in whole or in part), or seek information from them other than official documents, under the Act on Access to Public Information. The analysis covered the regulations concerning the parties to disciplinary proceedings contained in the Higher Education and Science Act, the 2022 Implementing Regulation governing disciplinary procedures, and the Code provisions applicable to disciplinary matters. The rules concerning access to public information were also analysed, both in normative terms and in light of administrative court rulings. The research employed the dogmatic method, and its findings are original and significant for both legal scholarship and practice. The study has conclusively demonstrated that information from disciplinary proceedings involving academic teachers, as well as the files of such proceedings, although considered public information, are not subject to disclosure to persons requesting access under the Act on Access to Public Information. This is because a special regulation – namely the appropriate application, under Article 305 of the Higher Education and Science Act, of Article 156 § 1 of that Code – excludes such applicants, until the conclusion of the disciplinary proceedings, from the group of persons who, under the current legal framework, have access to disciplinary files.

Ius NovumVol. 19(4)
Institute of Law (CN)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.