On Individuating Contingently Non-Concrete Objects

Abstract Timothy Williamson is known for defending the view that second-order S 5 system axiomatized with Barcan Formulae gives us the most sensible doctrine for metaphysical modality. Barcan Formulae require a constant domain of quantification in which absolutely everything is necessary. Among the objects that constitute this ‘everything’ we find contingently non-concrete objects . These objects do not occupy spatiotemporal coordinates and exist just in the logical sense of ‘exist’ defended by Williamson. In this paper, I try to characterize these sui generis objects arguing that the only properties we can use to individuate them are non-qualitative, including some modal properties. This is so because, as I show in the paper, if we try to individuate contingently non-concrete objects using qualitative properties we incur into the predicative reading of expressions like ‘possible X’ rejected by Williamson.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Metaphysica
Published
2025-12-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/mp-2025-0009
Primary Topic
Philosophy and Theoretical Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

On Individuating Contingently Non-Concrete Objects

V. Conde
Metaphysica
Philosophy and Theoretical Science
article

On Individuating Contingently Non-Concrete Objects

V. Conde
article en

Abstract

Abstract Timothy Williamson is known for defending the view that second-order S 5 system axiomatized with Barcan Formulae gives us the most sensible doctrine for metaphysical modality. Barcan Formulae require a constant domain of quantification in which absolutely everything is necessary. Among the objects that constitute this ‘everything’ we find contingently non-concrete objects . These objects do not occupy spatiotemporal coordinates and exist just in the logical sense of ‘exist’ defended by Williamson. In this paper, I try to characterize these sui generis objects arguing that the only properties we can use to individuate them are non-qualitative, including some modal properties. This is so because, as I show in the paper, if we try to individuate contingently non-concrete objects using qualitative properties we incur into the predicative reading of expressions like ‘possible X’ rejected by Williamson.

Metaphysica
Universidad de Salamanca (ES)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Philosophy and Theoretical Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.