Reviewing a Theory Life Cycle in Disaster Management

There is a lack of rigorous studies addressing the theory life cycle model in disaster management. Thus, this study aimed to review the theory life cycle to improve disaster management practices. The study employed a systematic literature review, guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. A reductionist model was proposed, including (1) theory inception, (2) theory scrutiny, and (3) theory termination (X) or establishment (O). This model was applied to four theories: suicide rate (X1), risk perception (X2), redundancy (O1), and all hazards (O2). In pursuing the reductionist model, the field must consider disaster characteristics, the advantages and disadvantages of various theories, the changing environment, a hybridization perspective, emergency education and training, and continuous improvement. This study emphasizes the question of adaptive relevance more than previous research.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Risk Analysis
Published
2025-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/risa.70172
Primary Topic
Disaster Management and Resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reviewing a Theory Life Cycle in Disaster Management

Kyoo‐Man Ha
Risk Analysis
Disaster Management and Resilience
article

Reviewing a Theory Life Cycle in Disaster Management

Kyoo‐Man Ha
article en

Abstract

There is a lack of rigorous studies addressing the theory life cycle model in disaster management. Thus, this study aimed to review the theory life cycle to improve disaster management practices. The study employed a systematic literature review, guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. A reductionist model was proposed, including (1) theory inception, (2) theory scrutiny, and (3) theory termination (X) or establishment (O). This model was applied to four theories: suicide rate (X1), risk perception (X2), redundancy (O1), and all hazards (O2). In pursuing the reductionist model, the field must consider disaster characteristics, the advantages and disadvantages of various theories, the changing environment, a hybridization perspective, emergency education and training, and continuous improvement. This study emphasizes the question of adaptive relevance more than previous research.

Risk AnalysisVol. 46(1)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Disaster Management and Resilience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.