Are transitional justice and memory policies at risk of regressing? The Spanish case in comparative perspective

This article examines the challenges and potential setbacks faced by memory and transitional justice policies in contemporary democracies. While the early optimism of the “memory boom” suggested linear progress, the electoral rise of far-right movements calls for a reassessment of this assumption. The erosion of the authoritarian stigma in post-dictatorial societies reveals the vulnerability of memory policies to political volatility. The article analyzes Spain as the main case, with comparative references to Brazil and Argentina. It shows that while setbacks are increasingly common, memory and transitional justice policies are subject to very complex dynamics where the historical, political, and social contexts matter in a field marked by the mobilizing potential of the political discourse on memory, on one hand, and the acquired rights resulting from transitional justice and memory policies, on the other.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Memory Studies
Published
2025-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17506980251397856
Primary Topic
Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Are transitional justice and memory policies at risk of regressing? The Spanish case in comparative perspective

Paloma Aguilar, Carsten Humlebæk, Roldán Jimeno
Memory Studies
Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration
article

Are transitional justice and memory policies at risk of regressing? The Spanish case in comparative perspective

Paloma Aguilar, Carsten Humlebæk, Roldán Jimeno
article en

Abstract

This article examines the challenges and potential setbacks faced by memory and transitional justice policies in contemporary democracies. While the early optimism of the “memory boom” suggested linear progress, the electoral rise of far-right movements calls for a reassessment of this assumption. The erosion of the authoritarian stigma in post-dictatorial societies reveals the vulnerability of memory policies to political volatility. The article analyzes Spain as the main case, with comparative references to Brazil and Argentina. It shows that while setbacks are increasingly common, memory and transitional justice policies are subject to very complex dynamics where the historical, political, and social contexts matter in a field marked by the mobilizing potential of the political discourse on memory, on one hand, and the acquired rights resulting from transitional justice and memory policies, on the other.

Memory StudiesVol. 19(1)
Universidad Pública de Navarra (UPNA) (ES), Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia (ES), Copenhagen Business School (DK)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Are transitional justice and memory policies at risk of regressing? The Spanish case in comparative perspective — Paloma Aguilar, Carsten Humlebæk, et al. · Memory Studies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS