Imagining ‘Our Ancestors’: Liberal Indigeneity and the Repudiation of Colonialism in Postimperial Britain

This article examines imaginative connections to an indigenous ancestry in popular British nonfiction writing on nature, landscape, and environment. It coins the term ‘liberal indigeneity’ to characterize ostensibly plural, inclusive engagements with Britain’s prehistoric past that promise to reconnect with nature and recover lost forms of identity, community, and relationality. Though animating interests that diverge considerably from the far right’s exclusionary racism, I suggest that liberal indigeneity’s understanding of ‘our ancestors’ is inflected by the coloniality it tries to reject. By overidentifying with actually existing indigenous peoples on the (ex-)imperial periphery, liberal indigeneity acknowledges the racial violence of empire but comes to terms with it inadequately by conjuring a scenario in which colonialism has made victims of us all. Drawing on discussions of white self-indigenisation in settler-colonial contexts, I suggest that liberal indigeneity is part of a similar process of racial formation where white privilege is maintained through its disavowal.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Theory Culture & Society
Published
2025-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02632764251395217
Primary Topic
Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Imagining ‘Our Ancestors’: Liberal Indigeneity and the Repudiation of Colonialism in Postimperial Britain

Ben Pitcher
Theory Culture & Society
Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature
article

Imagining ‘Our Ancestors’: Liberal Indigeneity and the Repudiation of Colonialism in Postimperial Britain

Ben Pitcher
article en

Abstract

This article examines imaginative connections to an indigenous ancestry in popular British nonfiction writing on nature, landscape, and environment. It coins the term ‘liberal indigeneity’ to characterize ostensibly plural, inclusive engagements with Britain’s prehistoric past that promise to reconnect with nature and recover lost forms of identity, community, and relationality. Though animating interests that diverge considerably from the far right’s exclusionary racism, I suggest that liberal indigeneity’s understanding of ‘our ancestors’ is inflected by the coloniality it tries to reject. By overidentifying with actually existing indigenous peoples on the (ex-)imperial periphery, liberal indigeneity acknowledges the racial violence of empire but comes to terms with it inadequately by conjuring a scenario in which colonialism has made victims of us all. Drawing on discussions of white self-indigenisation in settler-colonial contexts, I suggest that liberal indigeneity is part of a similar process of racial formation where white privilege is maintained through its disavowal.

Theory Culture & Society
University of Westminster (GB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Imagining ‘Our Ancestors’: Liberal Indigeneity and the Repudiation of Colonialism in Postimperial Britain — Ben Pitcher · Theory Culture & Society (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS