A capture–recapture framework for combining biologging data with physical captures to decompose and estimate demographic rates: Simulations across life cycles and application to polar bears

Abstract Estimating demographic rates of wild populations is critical to understanding their dynamics but can be challenging because large amounts of data are required, and parts of the life cycle of individuals may be unobserved. In numerous research programmes, capture–recapture (CR) data and biologging data are collected in parallel. The latter often contain information on individual state (e.g. alive/dead, breeding/non‐breeding), but this information is seldom combined with CR data. Here, we present a Bayesian multi‐event CR framework to combine biologging containing information on individual state with CR data. Because biologging can inform on unobservable life cycle events like early offspring mortality, it can allow decomposing a demographic rate into two more precise demographic rates. We outline the principle of the model using a generic example then use simulations in a range of life cycles (ungulate, seabird, galliform, bear) to assess model performance. We then apply our model to 38 years of CR and biologging data from the Svalbard polar bear ( Ursus maritimus ) population. Simulations indicated that across life cycles, our model recovered most parameters well and often outperformed a standard CR model despite increased complexity. Benefits of including biologging data in terms of parameter estimates were apparent even for low biologger deployment probabilities and increased with deployment probability. Benefits were greater at low recapture probability when the amount of information on breeding status contained in biologging data was increased and possibly in long‐lived species. Benefits also extended to yearly offspring survival rates in the species with extended parental care. When applied to Svalbard polar bears, our model decomposed the traditionally estimated breeding probability into the denning probability and early litter survival probability. We document sharp age‐related changes in survival and reproductive success and find low evidence that denning incurred a future reproduction cost. Finally, we uncover pervasive negative impacts of sea‐ice loss on demographic rates. Our model is applicable to any species where CR and biologging data are simultaneously available—provided that biologging data contain information on individual state. It can increase the benefit‐to‐cost ratio of deploying biologgers and provide new demographic insights.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
Published
2025-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210x.70229
Primary Topic
Marine animal studies overview
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A capture–recapture framework for combining biologging data with physical captures to decompose and estimate demographic rates: Simulations across life cycles and application to polar bears

Sarah CUBAYNES, Marwan Naciri, Jon Aars, Andrew E. Derocher et al.
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
Marine animal studies overview
article

A capture–recapture framework for combining biologging data with physical captures to decompose and estimate demographic rates: Simulations across life cycles and application to polar bears

Sarah CUBAYNES, Marwan Naciri, Jon Aars, Andrew E. Derocher, Magnus Andersen, Øystein Wiig
article en

Abstract

Abstract Estimating demographic rates of wild populations is critical to understanding their dynamics but can be challenging because large amounts of data are required, and parts of the life cycle of individuals may be unobserved. In numerous research programmes, capture–recapture (CR) data and biologging data are collected in parallel. The latter often contain information on individual state (e.g. alive/dead, breeding/non‐breeding), but this information is seldom combined with CR data. Here, we present a Bayesian multi‐event CR framework to combine biologging containing information on individual state with CR data. Because biologging can inform on unobservable life cycle events like early offspring mortality, it can allow decomposing a demographic rate into two more precise demographic rates. We outline the principle of the model using a generic example then use simulations in a range of life cycles (ungulate, seabird, galliform, bear) to assess model performance. We then apply our model to 38 years of CR and biologging data from the Svalbard polar bear ( Ursus maritimus ) population. Simulations indicated that across life cycles, our model recovered most parameters well and often outperformed a standard CR model despite increased complexity. Benefits of including biologging data in terms of parameter estimates were apparent even for low biologger deployment probabilities and increased with deployment probability. Benefits were greater at low recapture probability when the amount of information on breeding status contained in biologging data was increased and possibly in long‐lived species. Benefits also extended to yearly offspring survival rates in the species with extended parental care. When applied to Svalbard polar bears, our model decomposed the traditionally estimated breeding probability into the denning probability and early litter survival probability. We document sharp age‐related changes in survival and reproductive success and find low evidence that denning incurred a future reproduction cost. Finally, we uncover pervasive negative impacts of sea‐ice loss on demographic rates. Our model is applicable to any species where CR and biologging data are simultaneously available—provided that biologging data contain information on individual state. It can increase the benefit‐to‐cost ratio of deploying biologgers and provide new demographic insights.

Methods in Ecology and EvolutionVol. 17(2)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), University of Alberta (CA), École Pratique des Hautes Études (FR), Université de Montpellier (FR), Université Paris Sciences et Lettres (FR), Norsk Teknisk Museum (NO), Centre d'Écologie Fonctionnelle et Évolutive (FR), Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (FR), Norwegian Polar Institute (NO)
Responsible consumption and production
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Marine animal studies overview
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.