Monopsony and Mixed Martial Arts: An Antitrust Analysis
In Cung Le v. Zuffa , a class of mixed martial arts fighters accused the major promoter of unlawful monopsonization of the MMA fighter labor market. Since the case settled before trial, we have not heard from the jury whether Zuffa was, in fact, a monopsonist. Similarly, Zuffa’s business conduct has not been found to be competitively unreasonable. The plaintiff’s damage methodology went unchallenged, and the settlement terms have gone unexamined. In this article, we explore some of these issues.
Authors
- R. Clifford Blair
- Olivia Liu
Institutions
- University of Florida (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- The Antitrust Bulletin
- Published
- 2025-12-26
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0003603x251401220
- Primary Topic
- Doping in Sports
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00