Diagnostic performance of CT and MRI in mandibular trauma assessment – a prospective comparative study

To compare the diagnostic performance of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for surgically relevant parameters in mandibular trauma, evaluating five in-house-optimized MRI protocols with a dedicated 15-channel mandibular coil. Fifteen patients with 30 acute mandibular fractures underwent 3T MRI using five optimized protocols: UTE, StarVIBE, Dark Bone, DESS, and STIR. Three independent observers qualitatively rated image quality, fracture line visibility, cortical delineation, and bone-to-soft-tissue contrast on a five-point visual analog scale (5 = best, 1 = lowest). Quantitative analysis included measurement of the maximum distance of the fracture gap. Descriptive statistics and inter-observer agreement (Krippendorff’s α) were calculated. CT enabled rapid and accurate fracture detection in all cases. Among MRI protocols, UTE (85% of fractures correctly identified and accurately diagnosed) and StarVIBE (75%) demonstrated the best diagnostic performance, with excellent fracture line visibility, sharp cortical delineation, and strong inter-observer agreement (α = 0.7–1.0.7.0). Dark Bone and DESS provided variable results, while STIR was the least suitable for fracture depiction despite good soft-tissue contrast. Quantitative assessment of fracture gap distance showed the highest accuracy with StarVIBE, demonstrating minimal deviation compared to CT (0.13–0.21 mm; p > 0.05). While CT remains the standard in emergency settings and for delineating complex osseous pathologies, MRI, combining CT-like and water-sensitive sequences, offers a promising radiation-free alternative for simultaneous visualization of hard and soft tissues. This approach may facilitate comprehensive radiation-free trauma evaluation, improve detection of concomitant injuries, and further support individualized clinical decision-making. Swiss National Clinical Trials Portal: SNCTP000006343, ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT07012850.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Published
2025-12-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10006-025-01496-3
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Facial Trauma and Fracture Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diagnostic performance of CT and MRI in mandibular trauma assessment – a prospective comparative study

Sameena Sandhu, Egon Burian, Andreas M. Hötker, Thomas Frauenfelder et al.
1 citations
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
Facial Trauma and Fracture Management
2.01
article

Diagnostic performance of CT and MRI in mandibular trauma assessment – a prospective comparative study

Sameena Sandhu, Egon Burian, Andreas M. Hötker, Thomas Frauenfelder, Daniel Zedler, Bernd Stadlinger, Stefan Sommer, Harald Essig, Maximilian E.H. Wagner, Suen An Nynke Lie, Marc M. Precht, Adib Al-Haj Husain, Peter Kessler
article en
1 citations

Abstract

To compare the diagnostic performance of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for surgically relevant parameters in mandibular trauma, evaluating five in-house-optimized MRI protocols with a dedicated 15-channel mandibular coil. Fifteen patients with 30 acute mandibular fractures underwent 3T MRI using five optimized protocols: UTE, StarVIBE, Dark Bone, DESS, and STIR. Three independent observers qualitatively rated image quality, fracture line visibility, cortical delineation, and bone-to-soft-tissue contrast on a five-point visual analog scale (5 = best, 1 = lowest). Quantitative analysis included measurement of the maximum distance of the fracture gap. Descriptive statistics and inter-observer agreement (Krippendorff’s α) were calculated. CT enabled rapid and accurate fracture detection in all cases. Among MRI protocols, UTE (85% of fractures correctly identified and accurately diagnosed) and StarVIBE (75%) demonstrated the best diagnostic performance, with excellent fracture line visibility, sharp cortical delineation, and strong inter-observer agreement (α = 0.7–1.0.7.0). Dark Bone and DESS provided variable results, while STIR was the least suitable for fracture depiction despite good soft-tissue contrast. Quantitative assessment of fracture gap distance showed the highest accuracy with StarVIBE, demonstrating minimal deviation compared to CT (0.13–0.21 mm; p > 0.05). While CT remains the standard in emergency settings and for delineating complex osseous pathologies, MRI, combining CT-like and water-sensitive sequences, offers a promising radiation-free alternative for simultaneous visualization of hard and soft tissues. This approach may facilitate comprehensive radiation-free trauma evaluation, improve detection of concomitant injuries, and further support individualized clinical decision-making. Swiss National Clinical Trials Portal: SNCTP000006343, ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT07012850.

Oral and Maxillofacial SurgeryVol. 30(1)
University of Zurich (CH), Maastricht University Medical Centre (NL), University Hospital of Zurich (CH), Universitätsklinik Balgrist (CH), Siemens Healthcare (United States) (US)
Universitätsspital Zürich
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Facial Trauma and Fracture Management
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.