Impact of pathologically confirmed inner lung tumors on nodal upstaging and feasibility of segmentectomy versus lobectomy

<h2>Abstract</h2><h3>Objectives</h3> Previous studies reported worse outcomes for radiographically central tumors, but the impact of pathologically confirmed tumor origin remains unclear. This study investigated whether pathologically determined inner lesions are associated with nodal upstaging and poorer prognosis than outer lesions, and examined segmentectomy feasibility versus lobectomy. <h3>Methods</h3> We retrospectively analyzed participants with clinical stage IA (Union for International Cancer Control version 8) non−small cell lung cancer who underwent segmentectomy and lobectomy between November 2007 and December 2022 at 2 Japanese centers. The location of the tumor origin was confirmed pathologically via the Walter classification. Tumors classified as central and intermediate were allocated to the inner group, whereas those classified as peripheral type were allocated to the outer group. The oncologic outcomes were compared between the 2 groups. After propensity score matching analysis on the basis of sex, age, pulmonary function, serum carcinoembryonic antigen level, and radiographic findings, we compared oncologic outcomes in patients who underwent segmentectomy (n = 99) and lobectomy (n = 99) in the inner group. <h3>Results</h3> The cohort comprised inner (n = 654) and outer (n = 1275) groups. Nodal upstaging was greater in the inner group (13.1% [86/654] vs 9.5% [121/1275], <i>P</i> = .015). Five-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) was lower in the inner group (73.1%; 95% CI, 69.4%-77.3% vs 79.4%; 95% CI, 76.7%-81.8%, <i>P</i> = .002). Multivariable analysis did not identify segmentectomy as significant for RFS (hazard ratio, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.58-1.13; <i>P</i> = .20). In matched inner lesions, segmentectomy and lobectomy showed similar RFS (83.6%; 95% CI, 76.3-93.1% vs 76.4%; 95% CI, 66.8-87.4%; <i>P</i> = .80). <h3>Conclusions</h3> Although worse prognosis and increased nodal upstaging should be considered in inner primary tumors, segmentectomy is an acceptable treatment option compared with lobectomy for pathologically confirmed inner-located early-stage NSCLC.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JTCVS Open
Published
2025-12-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xjon.2025.101575
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Impact of pathologically confirmed inner lung tumors on nodal upstaging and feasibility of segmentectomy versus lobectomy

Shinya Tane, Naoe Jimbo, Daisuke Hokka, Yoshitaka Kitamura et al.
JTCVS Open
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Impact of pathologically confirmed inner lung tumors on nodal upstaging and feasibility of segmentectomy versus lobectomy

Shinya Tane, Naoe Jimbo, Daisuke Hokka, Yoshitaka Kitamura, Takefumi Doi, Hiroyuki Ogawa, Wataru Nishio, Yoshimasa Maniwa, Nahoko Shimizu, Masato Takanashi, Yuki Shimomura
article en

Abstract

<h2>Abstract</h2><h3>Objectives</h3> Previous studies reported worse outcomes for radiographically central tumors, but the impact of pathologically confirmed tumor origin remains unclear. This study investigated whether pathologically determined inner lesions are associated with nodal upstaging and poorer prognosis than outer lesions, and examined segmentectomy feasibility versus lobectomy. <h3>Methods</h3> We retrospectively analyzed participants with clinical stage IA (Union for International Cancer Control version 8) non−small cell lung cancer who underwent segmentectomy and lobectomy between November 2007 and December 2022 at 2 Japanese centers. The location of the tumor origin was confirmed pathologically via the Walter classification. Tumors classified as central and intermediate were allocated to the inner group, whereas those classified as peripheral type were allocated to the outer group. The oncologic outcomes were compared between the 2 groups. After propensity score matching analysis on the basis of sex, age, pulmonary function, serum carcinoembryonic antigen level, and radiographic findings, we compared oncologic outcomes in patients who underwent segmentectomy (n = 99) and lobectomy (n = 99) in the inner group. <h3>Results</h3> The cohort comprised inner (n = 654) and outer (n = 1275) groups. Nodal upstaging was greater in the inner group (13.1% [86/654] vs 9.5% [121/1275], <i>P</i> = .015). Five-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) was lower in the inner group (73.1%; 95% CI, 69.4%-77.3% vs 79.4%; 95% CI, 76.7%-81.8%, <i>P</i> = .002). Multivariable analysis did not identify segmentectomy as significant for RFS (hazard ratio, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.58-1.13; <i>P</i> = .20). In matched inner lesions, segmentectomy and lobectomy showed similar RFS (83.6%; 95% CI, 76.3-93.1% vs 76.4%; 95% CI, 66.8-87.4%; <i>P</i> = .80). <h3>Conclusions</h3> Although worse prognosis and increased nodal upstaging should be considered in inner primary tumors, segmentectomy is an acceptable treatment option compared with lobectomy for pathologically confirmed inner-located early-stage NSCLC.

JTCVS OpenVol. 29
Kobe University Hospital (JP), Hyogo Prefectural Cancer Center (JP), Kobe University (JP)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.