A double blind randomised study to determine the efficacy of dexmedetomidine nebulisation in attenuating the stress response to laryngoscopy and intubation

Aims and Objectives: During the induction of general anaesthesia, direct laryngoscopy and intubation often cause intense sympathetic stimulation leading to transient, unpredictable haemodynamic changes. Dexmedetomidine, a specific agonist of the α - 2 adrenergic receptors, can prevent these haemodynamic changes by its sympatholytic effects. Our objective was to assess whether nebulised dexmedetomidine would be effective in reducing the stress response associated with laryngoscopy and intubation. Material and Methods: In this randomised controlled trial, 90 patients scheduled for elective surgeries under general anaesthesia and fulfilling the inclusion criteria were divided into two equal groups. Study group patients (Group D) received dexmedetomidine 1µg/kg nebulisation 10minutes before the induction of anaesthesia, and the control group patients (Group N) received 0.9% saline nebulisation instead of dexmedetomidine. Results: Demographic characteristics were similar between the groups. After laryngoscopy and intubation, the control group exhibited a significant increase in systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and mean arterial pressure (MAP), whereas in group D, there was a decrease in SBP (at 1 min-116.7 ± 8.2; p <0.001, 5 min-104.7 ± 6.5; p <0.001, 10 min-101.5 ± 6.5; p <0.001), DBP (at 1 min-71.0 ± 7.9; p< 0.001, 5 min-64.4 ± 8.2; p <0.001, 10 min- 62.1 ± 8.1; p<0.001) and MAP (at 1 min-85.9 ± 5.8; p< 0.001, 5 min-78.4 ± 6.3; p <0.001, 10 min- 75.7 ± 6.4; p <0.001). Group D showed a dose-sparing effect on propofol, with comparable sedation scores between the two groups. Conclusion: Nebulised dexmedetomidine used as premedication effectively reduces the stress response to laryngoscopy and intubation, and is associated with no adverse effects.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-12-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25259/peak_6_2024
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A double blind randomised study to determine the efficacy of dexmedetomidine nebulisation in attenuating the stress response to laryngoscopy and intubation

Alisha Malipatil, N. Harshitha, Basavaraj Kallapur, Hemashree K et al.
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
article

A double blind randomised study to determine the efficacy of dexmedetomidine nebulisation in attenuating the stress response to laryngoscopy and intubation

Alisha Malipatil, N. Harshitha, Basavaraj Kallapur, Hemashree K, Aishwarya Bharamagoudar
article en

Abstract

Aims and Objectives: During the induction of general anaesthesia, direct laryngoscopy and intubation often cause intense sympathetic stimulation leading to transient, unpredictable haemodynamic changes. Dexmedetomidine, a specific agonist of the α - 2 adrenergic receptors, can prevent these haemodynamic changes by its sympatholytic effects. Our objective was to assess whether nebulised dexmedetomidine would be effective in reducing the stress response associated with laryngoscopy and intubation. Material and Methods: In this randomised controlled trial, 90 patients scheduled for elective surgeries under general anaesthesia and fulfilling the inclusion criteria were divided into two equal groups. Study group patients (Group D) received dexmedetomidine 1µg/kg nebulisation 10minutes before the induction of anaesthesia, and the control group patients (Group N) received 0.9% saline nebulisation instead of dexmedetomidine. Results: Demographic characteristics were similar between the groups. After laryngoscopy and intubation, the control group exhibited a significant increase in systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and mean arterial pressure (MAP), whereas in group D, there was a decrease in SBP (at 1 min-116.7 ± 8.2; p <0.001, 5 min-104.7 ± 6.5; p <0.001, 10 min-101.5 ± 6.5; p <0.001), DBP (at 1 min-71.0 ± 7.9; p< 0.001, 5 min-64.4 ± 8.2; p <0.001, 10 min- 62.1 ± 8.1; p<0.001) and MAP (at 1 min-85.9 ± 5.8; p< 0.001, 5 min-78.4 ± 6.3; p <0.001, 10 min- 75.7 ± 6.4; p <0.001). Group D showed a dose-sparing effect on propofol, with comparable sedation scores between the two groups. Conclusion: Nebulised dexmedetomidine used as premedication effectively reduces the stress response to laryngoscopy and intubation, and is associated with no adverse effects.

Vol. 1
Sri Dharmasthala Manjunatheshwara College of Dental Sciences & Hospital (IN), KLE Academy of Higher Education and Research (IN), Mandya Institute of Medical Sciences (IN), Karnataka Institute of Medical Sciences (IN), Dr. Hari Singh Gour University (IN)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.