Hip–spine relationship in total hip arthroplasty: Concepts, clinical relevance, and future perspectives

Dislocation remains a leading cause of revision in total hip arthroplasty (THA). While Lewinnek's “safe zone” for acetabular component placement has historically guided surgical orientation, dislocations still occur within this range, highlighting its limitations. Recent research has emphasized the importance of spinopelvic dynamics, particularly the relationship between pelvic tilt and spinal alignment, in influencing functional component orientation and dislocation risk. Patients with spinal stiffness, prior fusion, or spinopelvic imbalance are at higher risk for instability after THA. Several spinopelvic classification systems have been developed to stratify risk and guide implant positioning. However, these systems often rely on static imaging and fail to capture post-operative or age-related changes in spinopelvic mobility. Furthermore, they do not account for femoral motion or multidirectional impingement. Virtual range of motion (VROM) simulation offers a dynamic, patient-specific alternative by modeling critical movements, such as flexion, extension, and rotation, relative to the functional pelvic plane. This enables pre-operative planning of impingement-free zones tailored to individual pelvic and femoral alignment. Even in patients with altered spinopelvic dynamics, implants planned within these parameters may achieve stability without depending solely on sagittal spinopelvic classification. Although spinopelvic classification systems contribute valuable insights, their clinical utility is limited by post-operative variability and omission of femoral alignment. Patient-specific, VROM-based planning may offer clinical relevant implant orientation, improving THA stability and outcomes through individualized functional alignment strategies. • Spinopelvic mobility influences implant stability in total hip arthroplasty. • Static classification systems have key limitations in long-term clinical application. • Virtual range of motion planning ensures impingement-free motion in daily functional postures. • Supine functional pelvic plane offers a reliable reference for implant orientation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Joint Surgery and Research
Published
2025-12-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjoisr.2025.11.005
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hip–spine relationship in total hip arthroplasty: Concepts, clinical relevance, and future perspectives

Keisuke Uemura, Hidetoshi Hamada, Nobuhiko Sugano
1 citations
Journal of Joint Surgery and Research
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
2.01
article

Hip–spine relationship in total hip arthroplasty: Concepts, clinical relevance, and future perspectives

Keisuke Uemura, Hidetoshi Hamada, Nobuhiko Sugano
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Dislocation remains a leading cause of revision in total hip arthroplasty (THA). While Lewinnek's “safe zone” for acetabular component placement has historically guided surgical orientation, dislocations still occur within this range, highlighting its limitations. Recent research has emphasized the importance of spinopelvic dynamics, particularly the relationship between pelvic tilt and spinal alignment, in influencing functional component orientation and dislocation risk. Patients with spinal stiffness, prior fusion, or spinopelvic imbalance are at higher risk for instability after THA. Several spinopelvic classification systems have been developed to stratify risk and guide implant positioning. However, these systems often rely on static imaging and fail to capture post-operative or age-related changes in spinopelvic mobility. Furthermore, they do not account for femoral motion or multidirectional impingement. Virtual range of motion (VROM) simulation offers a dynamic, patient-specific alternative by modeling critical movements, such as flexion, extension, and rotation, relative to the functional pelvic plane. This enables pre-operative planning of impingement-free zones tailored to individual pelvic and femoral alignment. Even in patients with altered spinopelvic dynamics, implants planned within these parameters may achieve stability without depending solely on sagittal spinopelvic classification. Although spinopelvic classification systems contribute valuable insights, their clinical utility is limited by post-operative variability and omission of femoral alignment. Patient-specific, VROM-based planning may offer clinical relevant implant orientation, improving THA stability and outcomes through individualized functional alignment strategies. • Spinopelvic mobility influences implant stability in total hip arthroplasty. • Static classification systems have key limitations in long-term clinical application. • Virtual range of motion planning ensures impingement-free motion in daily functional postures. • Supine functional pelvic plane offers a reliable reference for implant orientation.

Journal of Joint Surgery and ResearchVol. 4(1)
The University of Osaka (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.