A Diagnostic Analysis of a Governance Failure Class in Contemporary AI Deployment

This document presents a diagnostic analysis of a governance failure class observed in contemporary AI deployment. It does not propose a policy framework, technical method, or implementation pathway. Its purpose is to establish the existence, structure, and location of a failure mode that arises prior to identifiable system risk, and to clarify why existing governance approaches do not capture it. The analysis identifies a governance inversion in which trust, delegation, and reliance are extended under ordinary conditions of use before specific risks are recognisable. As a result, the conditions that enable meaningful risk identification are themselves ungoverned. The failure class occurs at the level of human–system coupling and concerns the allocation of interpretive authority, the normalisation of reliance, and the implicit transfer of responsibility prior to observable malfunction, misuse, or harm. This document is diagnostic rather than prescriptive. It establishes a failure class but does not enumerate its manifestations or propose mitigation mechanisms.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18060403
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Diagnostic Analysis of a Governance Failure Class in Contemporary AI Deployment

Victoria Gavaza
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

A Diagnostic Analysis of a Governance Failure Class in Contemporary AI Deployment

Victoria Gavaza
article en

Abstract

This document presents a diagnostic analysis of a governance failure class observed in contemporary AI deployment. It does not propose a policy framework, technical method, or implementation pathway. Its purpose is to establish the existence, structure, and location of a failure mode that arises prior to identifiable system risk, and to clarify why existing governance approaches do not capture it. The analysis identifies a governance inversion in which trust, delegation, and reliance are extended under ordinary conditions of use before specific risks are recognisable. As a result, the conditions that enable meaningful risk identification are themselves ungoverned. The failure class occurs at the level of human–system coupling and concerns the allocation of interpretive authority, the normalisation of reliance, and the implicit transfer of responsibility prior to observable malfunction, misuse, or harm. This document is diagnostic rather than prescriptive. It establishes a failure class but does not enumerate its manifestations or propose mitigation mechanisms.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.