Revisiting the “Comfort Girls” of Report 49

Abstract In 1944, a Japanese American intelligence officer stationed in Ledo, India, unwittingly composed a famous historical document: “Japanese Prisoner of War Interrogation Report No. 49,” which focused on twenty Korean comfort women captured near Myitkyina, Burma. In the decades since, most historians have regarded the report as evidence of the Japanese state’s responsibility for the comfort woman system, but it has also been embraced by revisionists arguing the opposing case. This essay reassesses the document to show how it emerged from a many-sided struggle over how women’s bodies should be used in the simultaneous conflicts of empire and decolonization that constituted World War II in Burma. Korean comfort women’s status as both Japan’s “own women” and colonized subjects meant that they could be exploited to a variety of ends—both on the battlefield and in the realm of information warfare—for audiences including Anglophone newspaper readers, American military officers, Japanese soldiers, and Burmese civilians. Removed from its specific geographical and temporal context, the document’s elevation as a generic piece of evidence has obscured a larger history in which concerns about “sex slavery,” a concept notably absent from this report, emerged, retreated, and reemerged over the course of the war.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The American Historical Review
Published
2025-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/ahr/rhaf586
Primary Topic
Japanese History and Culture
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Revisiting the “Comfort Girls” of Report 49

Amy Stanley
The American Historical Review
Japanese History and Culture
article

Revisiting the “Comfort Girls” of Report 49

Amy Stanley
article en

Abstract

Abstract In 1944, a Japanese American intelligence officer stationed in Ledo, India, unwittingly composed a famous historical document: “Japanese Prisoner of War Interrogation Report No. 49,” which focused on twenty Korean comfort women captured near Myitkyina, Burma. In the decades since, most historians have regarded the report as evidence of the Japanese state’s responsibility for the comfort woman system, but it has also been embraced by revisionists arguing the opposing case. This essay reassesses the document to show how it emerged from a many-sided struggle over how women’s bodies should be used in the simultaneous conflicts of empire and decolonization that constituted World War II in Burma. Korean comfort women’s status as both Japan’s “own women” and colonized subjects meant that they could be exploited to a variety of ends—both on the battlefield and in the realm of information warfare—for audiences including Anglophone newspaper readers, American military officers, Japanese soldiers, and Burmese civilians. Removed from its specific geographical and temporal context, the document’s elevation as a generic piece of evidence has obscured a larger history in which concerns about “sex slavery,” a concept notably absent from this report, emerged, retreated, and reemerged over the course of the war.

The American Historical ReviewVol. 130(4)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Japanese History and Culture
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Revisiting the “Comfort Girls” of Report 49 — Amy Stanley · The American Historical Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS