Algorithmic Stranding: Optimization Systems and the Loss of Collective Agency

This paper extends the Beached Whale Hypothesis by applying its ecological–cognitive framework to algorithmic governance and optimization systems. While prior research has focused on algorithmic bias, transparency, and fairness, this study argues that a more fundamental pathology lies in the externalization of agency itself. Through a structural comparison between digital nationalism and algorithmic optimization, the paper conceptualizes “algorithmic stranding” as a collective navigational failure in which neither individuals nor institutions retain effective steering capacity. The study proposes that algorithms function not as instruments of control but as resonance amplifiers that intensify directionlessness under conditions of over-coherence. By reframing algorithmic power as a symptom of agency vacuum rather than intentional domination, this paper contributes a socio-cognitive model for understanding contemporary governance failures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-12-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18058706
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Algorithmic Stranding: Optimization Systems and the Loss of Collective Agency

Hitoshi Akimoto
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Algorithmic Stranding: Optimization Systems and the Loss of Collective Agency

Hitoshi Akimoto
article en

Abstract

This paper extends the Beached Whale Hypothesis by applying its ecological–cognitive framework to algorithmic governance and optimization systems. While prior research has focused on algorithmic bias, transparency, and fairness, this study argues that a more fundamental pathology lies in the externalization of agency itself. Through a structural comparison between digital nationalism and algorithmic optimization, the paper conceptualizes “algorithmic stranding” as a collective navigational failure in which neither individuals nor institutions retain effective steering capacity. The study proposes that algorithms function not as instruments of control but as resonance amplifiers that intensify directionlessness under conditions of over-coherence. By reframing algorithmic power as a symptom of agency vacuum rather than intentional domination, this paper contributes a socio-cognitive model for understanding contemporary governance failures.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Jinwen University of Science and Technology (TW)
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Algorithmic Stranding: Optimization Systems and the Loss of Collective Agency — Hitoshi Akimoto · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS