A Comprehensive Systematic Review of Targeted Evidence-Based Reviews in Special Education

Scholars in special education and related fields have developed and applied standards for classifying evidence-based practices (EBPs). Although many EBPs in special education have been identified by researchers applying one or more sets of EBP standards in systematic reviews published in peer-reviewed journal articles, this literature has yet to be synthesized. The purpose of this paper is to examine the classification of instructional practices in targeted EBP reviews published in peer-reviewed journals. A systematic review of literature identified 117 targeted EBP reviews published between 2005 and 2021, in which we identified 32 practices that were solely classified as EBPs. The findings of this review underscore the importance of conducting and reporting methodologically sound research to expand and clarify the evidence base for practices in special education. Implications for practitioners include the need to prioritize practices using the best available evidence while remaining critical consumers of emerging research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Remedial and Special Education
Published
2025-12-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/07419325251388491
Primary Topic
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comprehensive Systematic Review of Targeted Evidence-Based Reviews in Special Education

Lauren W. Collins, Sara E. C. Cook, B L Cook, Lysandra Cook
Remedial and Special Education
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
article

A Comprehensive Systematic Review of Targeted Evidence-Based Reviews in Special Education

Lauren W. Collins, Sara E. C. Cook, B L Cook, Lysandra Cook
article en

Abstract

Scholars in special education and related fields have developed and applied standards for classifying evidence-based practices (EBPs). Although many EBPs in special education have been identified by researchers applying one or more sets of EBP standards in systematic reviews published in peer-reviewed journal articles, this literature has yet to be synthesized. The purpose of this paper is to examine the classification of instructional practices in targeted EBP reviews published in peer-reviewed journals. A systematic review of literature identified 117 targeted EBP reviews published between 2005 and 2021, in which we identified 32 practices that were solely classified as EBPs. The findings of this review underscore the importance of conducting and reporting methodologically sound research to expand and clarify the evidence base for practices in special education. Implications for practitioners include the need to prioritize practices using the best available evidence while remaining critical consumers of emerging research.

Remedial and Special Education
University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US), San Diego State University (US), University of Virginia (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Behavioral and Psychological Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Comprehensive Systematic Review of Targeted Evidence-Based Reviews in Special Education — Lauren W. Collins, Sara E. C. Cook, et al. · Remedial and Special Education (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS