316L stainless steel fabricated by selective laser melting and spark plasma sintering: A comparative analysis on their microstructural, mechanical, and electrochemical performance

This work presents a comparative analysis of SS316L stainless steel fabricated via two different powder-based techniques: laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) and spark plasma sintering (SPS), emphasizing their microstructural evolution, mechanical behavior, and time-resolved electrochemical degradation in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). LPBF samples exhibited superior densification (∼99.58%) and a refined microstructure characterized, in contrast, a relatively higher residual porosity is observed in the SPS samples (∼1.25%). Mechanical testing revealed an enhanced yield strength (505±12.4 MPa), ultimate tensile strength (686±13.6 MPa), and hardness (237 ± 8.1 HV) in the LPBF samples due to high dislocation density and subgrain refinement, while SPS offered improved ductility (39%) owing to larger, equiaxed grains. Time-dependent corrosion evaluation was conducted at four stages: post-electrochemical polarization (EP), EP+15 min, EP+30 min, and full half-cycle (FHC), revealing a significantly more stable Cr 2 O 3 -enriched passive film on the LPBF surface, with delayed chloride-induced breakdown (breakdown potential ∼1302.8 mV) and lower pit depth and volume. Conversely, SPS samples showed early passivity breakdown (∼386.3 mV), elevated corrosion product accumulation, and pronounced pitting, attributed to microstructural heterogeneities and residual porosity. In addition, the 72h immersion study and EIS (Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy) analysis further confirmed the superior long term passivation stability of LPBF 316L, which developed a more stable oxide film, whereas SPS exhibited unstable passivation and sustained pit growth. The findings establish that LPBF SS316L exhibits superior microstructural integrity, mechanical performance, and long-term electrochemical stability, rendering it a more viable candidate for applications in chloride-rich and physiologically corrosive environments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Materials Research and Technology
Published
2025-12-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2025.12.266
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.71
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

316L stainless steel fabricated by selective laser melting and spark plasma sintering: A comparative analysis on their microstructural, mechanical, and electrochemical performance

A.K. Jeevanantham, Lokeshraj Kuppusamy, K.G. Prashanth
1 citations
Journal of Materials Research and Technology
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
0.71
article

316L stainless steel fabricated by selective laser melting and spark plasma sintering: A comparative analysis on their microstructural, mechanical, and electrochemical performance

A.K. Jeevanantham, Lokeshraj Kuppusamy, K.G. Prashanth
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This work presents a comparative analysis of SS316L stainless steel fabricated via two different powder-based techniques: laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) and spark plasma sintering (SPS), emphasizing their microstructural evolution, mechanical behavior, and time-resolved electrochemical degradation in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). LPBF samples exhibited superior densification (∼99.58%) and a refined microstructure characterized, in contrast, a relatively higher residual porosity is observed in the SPS samples (∼1.25%). Mechanical testing revealed an enhanced yield strength (505±12.4 MPa), ultimate tensile strength (686±13.6 MPa), and hardness (237 ± 8.1 HV) in the LPBF samples due to high dislocation density and subgrain refinement, while SPS offered improved ductility (39%) owing to larger, equiaxed grains. Time-dependent corrosion evaluation was conducted at four stages: post-electrochemical polarization (EP), EP+15 min, EP+30 min, and full half-cycle (FHC), revealing a significantly more stable Cr 2 O 3 -enriched passive film on the LPBF surface, with delayed chloride-induced breakdown (breakdown potential ∼1302.8 mV) and lower pit depth and volume. Conversely, SPS samples showed early passivity breakdown (∼386.3 mV), elevated corrosion product accumulation, and pronounced pitting, attributed to microstructural heterogeneities and residual porosity. In addition, the 72h immersion study and EIS (Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy) analysis further confirmed the superior long term passivation stability of LPBF 316L, which developed a more stable oxide film, whereas SPS exhibited unstable passivation and sustained pit growth. The findings establish that LPBF SS316L exhibits superior microstructural integrity, mechanical performance, and long-term electrochemical stability, rendering it a more viable candidate for applications in chloride-rich and physiologically corrosive environments.

Journal of Materials Research and TechnologyVol. 40
Tallinn University of Technology (EE), Vellore Institute of Technology University (IN), South China University of Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
0.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.