Responsible implementation of AI in Government: A Systematic Review of Governance and Organizational Structures

Responsible Artificial Intelligence (RAI) has emerged as a central concept to guide the development and use of artificial intelligence in government, yet its institutional implementation remains insufficiently understood. This study conducts a systematic literature review of 24 peer-reviewed articles to synthesize how organizational and governance structures enable or hinder the responsible implementation of AI in government. The findings reveal that while transparency, accountability, and legality are widely invoked as guiding principles, their realization depends on institutional capacity, organizational commitment, and the presence of formal governance mechanisms. The study contributes by consolidating fragmented evidence on RAI in government into a structured synthesis of organizational and governance determinants. Beyond mapping existing studies, it develops a conceptual framing that highlights how normative principles, organizational capacities, and governance mechanisms interact to shape implementation, and reveals the symbolic orientation of many current governance practices as a key challenge for moving toward actionable accountability.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
TH Wildau (Technical University of Applied Sciences Wildau)
Published
2025-12-23
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Responsible implementation of AI in Government: A Systematic Review of Governance and Organizational Structures

Isabell Peters
TH Wildau (Technical University of Applied Sciences Wildau)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Responsible implementation of AI in Government: A Systematic Review of Governance and Organizational Structures

Isabell Peters
article en

Abstract

Responsible Artificial Intelligence (RAI) has emerged as a central concept to guide the development and use of artificial intelligence in government, yet its institutional implementation remains insufficiently understood. This study conducts a systematic literature review of 24 peer-reviewed articles to synthesize how organizational and governance structures enable or hinder the responsible implementation of AI in government. The findings reveal that while transparency, accountability, and legality are widely invoked as guiding principles, their realization depends on institutional capacity, organizational commitment, and the presence of formal governance mechanisms. The study contributes by consolidating fragmented evidence on RAI in government into a structured synthesis of organizational and governance determinants. Beyond mapping existing studies, it develops a conceptual framing that highlights how normative principles, organizational capacities, and governance mechanisms interact to shape implementation, and reveals the symbolic orientation of many current governance practices as a key challenge for moving toward actionable accountability.

TH Wildau (Technical University of Applied Sciences Wildau)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Responsible implementation of AI in Government: A Systematic Review of Governance and Organizational Structures — Isabell Peters · TH Wildau (Technical University of Applied Sciences Wildau) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS