Acceptance of Artificial Intelligence Algorithms in Local Governance: Citizens’ Perspective

Based on data from three representative surveys conducted in Singapore, Tallinn, and Warsaw, this study examines individual-level factors influencing the acceptance of AI in local governance. Drawing on existing literature, we identified four key variables: a) citizen efficacy, b) confidence in local governance, c) experience with technology, d) technology-related anxiety. We conducted separate Structural Equation Models for each city to uncover context-specific dynamics. Our results reveal a consistent positive relation between confidence in governance and AI acceptance. In Singapore, citizens demonstrate higher individual agency, with both civic efficacy and institutional confidence driving AI acceptance, while prior technology experience plays a lesser role. In Warsaw, confidence in governance and technology-related anxiety emerge as strong predictors. In Tallinn, technology-related anxiety is the only significant factor, suggesting a more emotionally driven public approach toward AI. These findings highlight the importance of sociopolitical context in shaping public attitudes toward algorithmic decision-making in local governance.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa)
Published
2025-12-23
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Acceptance of Artificial Intelligence Algorithms in Local Governance: Citizens’ Perspective

Magdalena Roszczyńska-Kurasińska, Anna Wnuk, Mateusz Trochymiak, Anna Domaradzka
ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Acceptance of Artificial Intelligence Algorithms in Local Governance: Citizens’ Perspective

Magdalena Roszczyńska-Kurasińska, Anna Wnuk, Mateusz Trochymiak, Anna Domaradzka
article en

Abstract

Based on data from three representative surveys conducted in Singapore, Tallinn, and Warsaw, this study examines individual-level factors influencing the acceptance of AI in local governance. Drawing on existing literature, we identified four key variables: a) citizen efficacy, b) confidence in local governance, c) experience with technology, d) technology-related anxiety. We conducted separate Structural Equation Models for each city to uncover context-specific dynamics. Our results reveal a consistent positive relation between confidence in governance and AI acceptance. In Singapore, citizens demonstrate higher individual agency, with both civic efficacy and institutional confidence driving AI acceptance, while prior technology experience plays a lesser role. In Warsaw, confidence in governance and technology-related anxiety emerge as strong predictors. In Tallinn, technology-related anxiety is the only significant factor, suggesting a more emotionally driven public approach toward AI. These findings highlight the importance of sociopolitical context in shaping public attitudes toward algorithmic decision-making in local governance.

ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.