Is Visual Complexity Always Better? Evidence from Cover Images in Online Crowdfunding

In the highly competitive environment of crowdfunding platforms, cover images have become a crucial force in capturing the attention of potential backers. However, effective visual communication strategies for cover images remain underexplored. To address this gap, we investigate the dual impact of visual complexity in cover images. We divide visual complexity into two dimensions: feature complexity at the pixel level and design complexity at the object level. Based on the Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM), we propose that these dimensions of visual complexity have differentiated effects in highly competitive crowdfunding contexts: feature complexity helps enhance project performance, whereas design complexity exerts a negative influence. Empirical analysis of large-scale project data from over 1.2 million loan-based crowdfunding campaigns validates these arguments. The study enriches our understanding of how visual factors shape crowdfunding outcomes and offers practical guidance for fundraisers to optimize cover images design.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa)
Published
2025-12-23
Primary Topic
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is Visual Complexity Always Better? Evidence from Cover Images in Online Crowdfunding

Weitao He, Luning Liu, Haohao Li
ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa)
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
article

Is Visual Complexity Always Better? Evidence from Cover Images in Online Crowdfunding

Weitao He, Luning Liu, Haohao Li
article en

Abstract

In the highly competitive environment of crowdfunding platforms, cover images have become a crucial force in capturing the attention of potential backers. However, effective visual communication strategies for cover images remain underexplored. To address this gap, we investigate the dual impact of visual complexity in cover images. We divide visual complexity into two dimensions: feature complexity at the pixel level and design complexity at the object level. Based on the Elaboration Likelihood Model (ELM), we propose that these dimensions of visual complexity have differentiated effects in highly competitive crowdfunding contexts: feature complexity helps enhance project performance, whereas design complexity exerts a negative influence. Empirical analysis of large-scale project data from over 1.2 million loan-based crowdfunding campaigns validates these arguments. The study enriches our understanding of how visual factors shape crowdfunding outcomes and offers practical guidance for fundraisers to optimize cover images design.

ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
FinTech, Crowdfunding, Digital Finance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.