Will They Be More Honest With an (External) Proctor? Evaluating UFC Match Performance Before and After the Adoption of the USADA Doping Program

Over the eight years from 2015 to 2023, the Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) partnered with the United States Anti-Doping Agency (USADA) to institute comprehensive external oversight of doping controls. This study investigates the effects of transitioning from internally administered anti-doping protocols to exclusive external governance by comparing UFC performance metrics before and during the USADA partnership. Using a Difference-in-Differences (DiD) approach with data from 2012 to 2018, we find that match duration significantly increased, while the likelihood of extreme outcomes, knockouts (KO), technical knockouts (TKO), and submissions, decreased during the USADA period. These results suggest that performance-enhancing drugs (PEDs) could be more prevalent before USADA oversight and declined once stricter testing was introduced. The findings imply that UFC’s move away from USADA could lead to increased PED use among fighters.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
ODU Digital Commons (Old Dominion University)
Published
2025-12-23
Primary Topic
Doping in Sports
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Will They Be More Honest With an (External) Proctor? Evaluating UFC Match Performance Before and After the Adoption of the USADA Doping Program

Moonsup Hyun, Sehwon Kang, Yo Han Lee, Wonsok (Frank) Jee
ODU Digital Commons (Old Dominion University)
Doping in Sports
article

Will They Be More Honest With an (External) Proctor? Evaluating UFC Match Performance Before and After the Adoption of the USADA Doping Program

Moonsup Hyun, Sehwon Kang, Yo Han Lee, Wonsok (Frank) Jee
article en

Abstract

Over the eight years from 2015 to 2023, the Ultimate Fighting Championship (UFC) partnered with the United States Anti-Doping Agency (USADA) to institute comprehensive external oversight of doping controls. This study investigates the effects of transitioning from internally administered anti-doping protocols to exclusive external governance by comparing UFC performance metrics before and during the USADA partnership. Using a Difference-in-Differences (DiD) approach with data from 2012 to 2018, we find that match duration significantly increased, while the likelihood of extreme outcomes, knockouts (KO), technical knockouts (TKO), and submissions, decreased during the USADA period. These results suggest that performance-enhancing drugs (PEDs) could be more prevalent before USADA oversight and declined once stricter testing was introduced. The findings imply that UFC’s move away from USADA could lead to increased PED use among fighters.

ODU Digital Commons (Old Dominion University)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Doping in Sports
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Will They Be More Honest With an (External) Proctor? Evaluating UFC Match Performance Before and After the Adoption of the USADA Doping Program — Moonsup Hyun, Sehwon Kang, et al. · ODU Digital Commons (Old Dominion University) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS