Wired to Wander: Values in Digital Nomadism

Digital nomadism presents conflicting value judgments in existing literature, yet the sources of these conflicts remain underexplored. This study examines why conflicting valuations persist in digital nomadism using the values in digital phenomena framework. We conducted an interpretive qualitative study with 18 semi-structured interviews with digital nomads and analyzed 74 news articles from 12 international publications representing diverse cultural and political perspectives. Our analysis reveals three distinct sources of value conflicts: stakeholder perspective conflicts (different stakeholders applying different value systems), intra-value system conflicts (same value system yielding conflicting judgments), and object-dependent conflicts (same stakeholder generating different valuations for different aspects). Findings demonstrate that value judgments are fundamentally dynamic and multidimensional, requiring simultaneous consideration of the evaluated object, evaluating stakeholder, and applied value system. This research challenges assumptions of value homogeneity within stakeholder groups and provides a comprehensive framework for understanding value conflicts in digital nomadism.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa)
Published
2025-12-23
Primary Topic
Facilities and Workplace Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Wired to Wander: Values in Digital Nomadism

Mike Seymour, Shaoxin Wang, Daniel Schlagwein
ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa)
Facilities and Workplace Management
article

Wired to Wander: Values in Digital Nomadism

Mike Seymour, Shaoxin Wang, Daniel Schlagwein
article en

Abstract

Digital nomadism presents conflicting value judgments in existing literature, yet the sources of these conflicts remain underexplored. This study examines why conflicting valuations persist in digital nomadism using the values in digital phenomena framework. We conducted an interpretive qualitative study with 18 semi-structured interviews with digital nomads and analyzed 74 news articles from 12 international publications representing diverse cultural and political perspectives. Our analysis reveals three distinct sources of value conflicts: stakeholder perspective conflicts (different stakeholders applying different value systems), intra-value system conflicts (same value system yielding conflicting judgments), and object-dependent conflicts (same stakeholder generating different valuations for different aspects). Findings demonstrate that value judgments are fundamentally dynamic and multidimensional, requiring simultaneous consideration of the evaluated object, evaluating stakeholder, and applied value system. This research challenges assumptions of value homogeneity within stakeholder groups and provides a comprehensive framework for understanding value conflicts in digital nomadism.

ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa)
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Facilities and Workplace Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Wired to Wander: Values in Digital Nomadism — Mike Seymour, Shaoxin Wang, et al. · ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS