Measuring Stakeholder Voting Coalition Stability in Regional Transmission Organizations

We use network analysis to probe votes taken at the top-level committees in three RTOs: the New England Independent System Operator, the New York Independent System Operator, and PJM. Whereas CAISO, MISO, and PJM were chosen because of the diversity in their stakeholder processes, ISO-NE, NYISO, and PJM were chosen because of their similarities, particularly their hierarchical voting structure and divisions of stakeholders into similar classes (i.e generators, transmission owners, end-use customers, and so on). This network approach allows us to look at how political power structures vary across the three RTOs based on the unique differences in the voting structures between the RTOs. We address three questions based on this network analysis: Whether specific constituencies can be identified; whether these constituencies are stable over different voting issues; and whether they are stable over time.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa)
Published
2025-12-23
Primary Topic
Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measuring Stakeholder Voting Coalition Stability in Regional Transmission Organizations

Seth Blumsack, Nick Johnson
ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa)
Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
article

Measuring Stakeholder Voting Coalition Stability in Regional Transmission Organizations

Seth Blumsack, Nick Johnson
article en

Abstract

We use network analysis to probe votes taken at the top-level committees in three RTOs: the New England Independent System Operator, the New York Independent System Operator, and PJM. Whereas CAISO, MISO, and PJM were chosen because of the diversity in their stakeholder processes, ISO-NE, NYISO, and PJM were chosen because of their similarities, particularly their hierarchical voting structure and divisions of stakeholders into similar classes (i.e generators, transmission owners, end-use customers, and so on). This network approach allows us to look at how political power structures vary across the three RTOs based on the unique differences in the voting structures between the RTOs. We address three questions based on this network analysis: Whether specific constituencies can be identified; whether these constituencies are stable over different voting issues; and whether they are stable over time.

ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.