Emotions in Collective Risk Dilemmas Using Fuzzy Linguistic Rules

The goal of this paper is to propose how to model emotions in climate change policies through evolutionary game theory (i.e., collective risk dilemmas) using fuzzy linguistic rules. We will first study evolutionary game theory models for exploring climate change policies and decisions to enhance cooperation between the policy players. Using computational agent-based simulations, we will build a framework where we incorporate and extend evolutionary game models with players' emotions in the game dynamics. These emotions, modeled by fuzzy linguistic rules, are a way for players to reconsider their strategies when playing the game. Results show how these rules representing emotions can better control defection in the collective-risk dilemmas while modeling a more realistic way of dealing with players' features.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa)
Published
2025-12-23
Primary Topic
Cognitive Science and Mapping
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Emotions in Collective Risk Dilemmas Using Fuzzy Linguistic Rules

Hussein A. Abbass, Óscar Cordón, Manuel Chica
ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa)
Cognitive Science and Mapping
article

Emotions in Collective Risk Dilemmas Using Fuzzy Linguistic Rules

Hussein A. Abbass, Óscar Cordón, Manuel Chica
article en

Abstract

The goal of this paper is to propose how to model emotions in climate change policies through evolutionary game theory (i.e., collective risk dilemmas) using fuzzy linguistic rules. We will first study evolutionary game theory models for exploring climate change policies and decisions to enhance cooperation between the policy players. Using computational agent-based simulations, we will build a framework where we incorporate and extend evolutionary game models with players' emotions in the game dynamics. These emotions, modeled by fuzzy linguistic rules, are a way for players to reconsider their strategies when playing the game. Results show how these rules representing emotions can better control defection in the collective-risk dilemmas while modeling a more realistic way of dealing with players' features.

ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Cognitive Science and Mapping
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.