Counting Species of Ideas: A Bayesian Capture–Recapture Ecology Framework for Estimating LLM Novelty

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used for ideation tasks across domains, ranging from product development to marketing and creative writing. Yet, we lack principled methods to quantify their genuine capacity for novelty and ideation. LLMs derive their generative potential from extensive training data, model architectures, and optimization objectives. These factors collectively define a large yet bounded ideation space. However, standard evaluation methods—typically centered around output-level novelty or diversity—only capture a limited view of this broader ideation landscape. To overcome this limitation, we propose shifting the evaluation focus from isolated outputs to this underlying ideation space. Effectively exploring this space involves answering foundational questions: How expansive is this space? How many unique ideas can the model potentially generate? By adapting capture-recapture (CR) theory from ecology, we introduce an estimation framework tailored to the generative behavior of LLMs and infer the unseen idea space beyond observed samples. Validation through asymptotic extrapolation confirms the reliability of our framework, which offers a principled approach to understanding and comparing the innovation capacities of LLMs.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa)
Published
2025-12-23
Primary Topic
Computational and Text Analysis Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Counting Species of Ideas: A Bayesian Capture–Recapture Ecology Framework for Estimating LLM Novelty

Dokyun Lee, Shujie Liu, Xiangwei Kong
ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa)
Computational and Text Analysis Methods
article

Counting Species of Ideas: A Bayesian Capture–Recapture Ecology Framework for Estimating LLM Novelty

Dokyun Lee, Shujie Liu, Xiangwei Kong
article en

Abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used for ideation tasks across domains, ranging from product development to marketing and creative writing. Yet, we lack principled methods to quantify their genuine capacity for novelty and ideation. LLMs derive their generative potential from extensive training data, model architectures, and optimization objectives. These factors collectively define a large yet bounded ideation space. However, standard evaluation methods—typically centered around output-level novelty or diversity—only capture a limited view of this broader ideation landscape. To overcome this limitation, we propose shifting the evaluation focus from isolated outputs to this underlying ideation space. Effectively exploring this space involves answering foundational questions: How expansive is this space? How many unique ideas can the model potentially generate? By adapting capture-recapture (CR) theory from ecology, we introduce an estimation framework tailored to the generative behavior of LLMs and infer the unseen idea space beyond observed samples. Validation through asymptotic extrapolation confirms the reliability of our framework, which offers a principled approach to understanding and comparing the innovation capacities of LLMs.

ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa)
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Computational and Text Analysis Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.