Co-Piloting with GenAI: A Functional Typology of Student-AI Interaction in Business Education

To prepare business students for an AI-enabled workforce, educators are increasingly integrating generative AI (GenAI) tools into the classroom. Yet little is known about how students actually use these tools for complex tasks. This study examines how undergraduate students use GenAI during a strategic decision-making activity. We analyzed 167 student prompts using a dual-framework approach: the AI-ICE model to assess cognitive engagement, and an inductively developed typology of GenAI co-pilot roles: Content Generator, Task Executor, Advisor, Thinking Partner, and Role-Shifting. While students demonstrated cognitive range, most used GenAI in limited functional roles. Even when tasks called for strategic thinking, students rarely used GenAI as a collaborator. This disconnect between what students think and how they use GenAI highlights a gap in current instructional practice. Our findings offer a functional typology of student-GenAI interaction and practical insights for designing GenAI-enabled learning experiences in business education.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa)
Published
2025-12-23
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Co-Piloting with GenAI: A Functional Typology of Student-AI Interaction in Business Education

Joel Elson, Erin Bass, Erin Pleggenkuhle-Miles
ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa)
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Co-Piloting with GenAI: A Functional Typology of Student-AI Interaction in Business Education

Joel Elson, Erin Bass, Erin Pleggenkuhle-Miles
article en

Abstract

To prepare business students for an AI-enabled workforce, educators are increasingly integrating generative AI (GenAI) tools into the classroom. Yet little is known about how students actually use these tools for complex tasks. This study examines how undergraduate students use GenAI during a strategic decision-making activity. We analyzed 167 student prompts using a dual-framework approach: the AI-ICE model to assess cognitive engagement, and an inductively developed typology of GenAI co-pilot roles: Content Generator, Task Executor, Advisor, Thinking Partner, and Role-Shifting. While students demonstrated cognitive range, most used GenAI in limited functional roles. Even when tasks called for strategic thinking, students rarely used GenAI as a collaborator. This disconnect between what students think and how they use GenAI highlights a gap in current instructional practice. Our findings offer a functional typology of student-GenAI interaction and practical insights for designing GenAI-enabled learning experiences in business education.

ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa)
Openalex Percentile: Top 39%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Co-Piloting with GenAI: A Functional Typology of Student-AI Interaction in Business Education — Joel Elson, Erin Bass, et al. · ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS