Implementation Barriers to Digital Mental Health Screening: A Qualitative Study of CAT-MH Implementations

The implementation of digital mental health screening tools shows promise for better identifying mental health needs in primary care settings, but their adoption remains challenging. This study uses CAT-MH as an example to investigate implementation barriers that prevent these tools from being integrated into clinical workflows across various healthcare settings. Following an exploratory qualitative design, we conducted interviews with eight healthcare professionals who have practical experience in implementing CAT-MH in their institutions. We used the EPIS framework to develop interview protocols and data analysis procedures. Our analysis revealed three primary barriers to implementation of CAT-MH: (1) EHR integration, (2) ambiguous role definitions and (3) insufficient organizational support. Our findings indicate that institutional-level coordination between stakeholders that influence system-wide implementation and clinical workflows must improve to support both effective integration and sustained use of innovative digital screening tool.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa)
Published
2025-12-23
Primary Topic
Digital Mental Health Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Implementation Barriers to Digital Mental Health Screening: A Qualitative Study of CAT-MH Implementations

Bengisu Tulu, Kaidi Huang, Rachel Davis-Martin, Sharon Johnson
ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa)
Digital Mental Health Interventions
article

Implementation Barriers to Digital Mental Health Screening: A Qualitative Study of CAT-MH Implementations

Bengisu Tulu, Kaidi Huang, Rachel Davis-Martin, Sharon Johnson
article en

Abstract

The implementation of digital mental health screening tools shows promise for better identifying mental health needs in primary care settings, but their adoption remains challenging. This study uses CAT-MH as an example to investigate implementation barriers that prevent these tools from being integrated into clinical workflows across various healthcare settings. Following an exploratory qualitative design, we conducted interviews with eight healthcare professionals who have practical experience in implementing CAT-MH in their institutions. We used the EPIS framework to develop interview protocols and data analysis procedures. Our analysis revealed three primary barriers to implementation of CAT-MH: (1) EHR integration, (2) ambiguous role definitions and (3) insufficient organizational support. Our findings indicate that institutional-level coordination between stakeholders that influence system-wide implementation and clinical workflows must improve to support both effective integration and sustained use of innovative digital screening tool.

ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa)
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Digital Mental Health Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Implementation Barriers to Digital Mental Health Screening: A Qualitative Study of CAT-MH Implementations — Bengisu Tulu, Kaidi Huang, et al. · ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS