AI, Deepfakes, and the Normalization of Digital Harm: A Social Media Cultivation Perspective

This research-in-progress study examines how repeated exposure to AI-generated deepfake content on social media contributes to the psychological normalization of unethical behavior, particularly among young adults. Deepfakes, along with other forms of manipulated media, are increasingly perceived as trivial or entertaining, even as their ethical and legal implications remain underexamined. Extending cultivation theory to the social media context, this study proposes an emotion–cognition framework in which users’ emotional and cognitive responses shape internalized attitudes and beliefs. These internal states lead to desensitization and moral disengagement, which in turn normalize deepfake content. Young adults, whose neurocognitive and moral regulation are still developing, may be especially vulnerable to these effects. The study contributes to the IS field by illuminating how generative AI media influence morality and reshape perceptions of authenticity, credibility, and digital knowledge practices. The conceptual framework is subject to further refinement, with empirical testing forthcoming.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa)
Published
2025-12-23
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI, Deepfakes, and the Normalization of Digital Harm: A Social Media Cultivation Perspective

Alexandra Durcikova, Garan Kim
ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa)
Misinformation and Its Impacts
article

AI, Deepfakes, and the Normalization of Digital Harm: A Social Media Cultivation Perspective

Alexandra Durcikova, Garan Kim
article en

Abstract

This research-in-progress study examines how repeated exposure to AI-generated deepfake content on social media contributes to the psychological normalization of unethical behavior, particularly among young adults. Deepfakes, along with other forms of manipulated media, are increasingly perceived as trivial or entertaining, even as their ethical and legal implications remain underexamined. Extending cultivation theory to the social media context, this study proposes an emotion–cognition framework in which users’ emotional and cognitive responses shape internalized attitudes and beliefs. These internal states lead to desensitization and moral disengagement, which in turn normalize deepfake content. Young adults, whose neurocognitive and moral regulation are still developing, may be especially vulnerable to these effects. The study contributes to the IS field by illuminating how generative AI media influence morality and reshape perceptions of authenticity, credibility, and digital knowledge practices. The conceptual framework is subject to further refinement, with empirical testing forthcoming.

ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

AI, Deepfakes, and the Normalization of Digital Harm: A Social Media Cultivation Perspective — Alexandra Durcikova, Garan Kim · ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS