Understanding Dietary Transitions through Digital Narratives: A Computational Perspective on Personal Sustainability Decisions

This study examines how individuals navigate plant-based dietary transitions using 2,165 YouTube video transcripts describing personal journeys. We apply computational methods, specifically stance classification and thematic analysis, to categorize content into Continuation, Discontinuation, and In-Between states. This classification reveals motivators such as health improvements, ethical convictions, community support, and barriers including nutritional deficiencies, identity conflicts, cultural attachments, and practical constraints. These dual influences highlight the ambivalent nature of dietary change, where the same factors can act as catalysts or inhibitors depending on context. Health outcomes and ethical considerations often reinforce continuation, while practical obstacles, identity tensions, and misinformation drive discontinuation or sustain ambivalence. Mooring factors such as identity integration, cultural traditions, social environments are critical for whether individuals maintain commitment while others hesitate or withdraw. Full operationalization of the Push Pull Mooring model is planned to provide insights into personal decision making for sustainable eating and AI-driven decision-support systems.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa)
Published
2025-12-23
Primary Topic
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding Dietary Transitions through Digital Narratives: A Computational Perspective on Personal Sustainability Decisions

Lucia A. Reisch, M.L. Gandhi, Arpan Kumar Kar, Abhishek Pratap Singh
ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa)
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
article

Understanding Dietary Transitions through Digital Narratives: A Computational Perspective on Personal Sustainability Decisions

Lucia A. Reisch, M.L. Gandhi, Arpan Kumar Kar, Abhishek Pratap Singh
article en

Abstract

This study examines how individuals navigate plant-based dietary transitions using 2,165 YouTube video transcripts describing personal journeys. We apply computational methods, specifically stance classification and thematic analysis, to categorize content into Continuation, Discontinuation, and In-Between states. This classification reveals motivators such as health improvements, ethical convictions, community support, and barriers including nutritional deficiencies, identity conflicts, cultural attachments, and practical constraints. These dual influences highlight the ambivalent nature of dietary change, where the same factors can act as catalysts or inhibitors depending on context. Health outcomes and ethical considerations often reinforce continuation, while practical obstacles, identity tensions, and misinformation drive discontinuation or sustain ambivalence. Mooring factors such as identity integration, cultural traditions, social environments are critical for whether individuals maintain commitment while others hesitate or withdraw. Full operationalization of the Push Pull Mooring model is planned to provide insights into personal decision making for sustainable eating and AI-driven decision-support systems.

ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.