Hybrid Intelligence in Higher Education: Exploring Disciplinary and Experiential Determinants of Students’ AI Acceptance

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education is no longer a question of 'if', but of 'how'. Specifically, which roles humans and technology can and should play. Based on a survey of 731 students across diverse disciplines, this study explores how prior AI experience and field of study influence students’ acceptance of hybrid teaching models. While 84% reject AI-only instruction, 62% support a collaborative model combining human and machine intelligence. Drawing on Task-Technology Fit (TTF) and Hybrid Intelligence theory, we demonstrate that acceptance is driven less by novelty and more by perceived educational value. Students with prior AI exposure report significantly higher acceptance of hybrid instructional formats, especially in management-oriented disciplines. Our findings offer empirically grounded guidance for developing ethically grounded, effective AI-assisted learning environments that complement rather than replace human instruction.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa)
Published
2025-12-23
Primary Topic
AI in Service Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hybrid Intelligence in Higher Education: Exploring Disciplinary and Experiential Determinants of Students’ AI Acceptance

Joschka Mütterlein, Mareike Mueller
ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa)
AI in Service Interactions
article

Hybrid Intelligence in Higher Education: Exploring Disciplinary and Experiential Determinants of Students’ AI Acceptance

Joschka Mütterlein, Mareike Mueller
article en

Abstract

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education is no longer a question of 'if', but of 'how'. Specifically, which roles humans and technology can and should play. Based on a survey of 731 students across diverse disciplines, this study explores how prior AI experience and field of study influence students’ acceptance of hybrid teaching models. While 84% reject AI-only instruction, 62% support a collaborative model combining human and machine intelligence. Drawing on Task-Technology Fit (TTF) and Hybrid Intelligence theory, we demonstrate that acceptance is driven less by novelty and more by perceived educational value. Students with prior AI exposure report significantly higher acceptance of hybrid instructional formats, especially in management-oriented disciplines. Our findings offer empirically grounded guidance for developing ethically grounded, effective AI-assisted learning environments that complement rather than replace human instruction.

ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
AI in Service Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.