Augmentation Innovation Paradox: Rethinking Validation in Generative AI-Driven Open Innovation

Open innovation is undergoing a fundamental transformation with the rise of artificial intelligence, particularly through the emergence of augmented innovation, characterized by the collaborative interplay between human creativity and generative AI. This study investigates a central tension in this shift: the ideation–validation paradox. While generative AI (GenAI) significantly accelerates the process of idea generation, it simultaneously introduces new complexities around validating the quality, novelty, and feasibility of those ideas. To address this paradox, we propose an extended ideation framework that identifies five socio-technical mechanisms aimed at making GenAI-driven contributions more systematic, auditable, and responsible. We conclude by outlining a future research agenda to advance our understanding of human–AI collaboration within open innovation ecosystems.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa)
Published
2025-12-23
Primary Topic
Open Source Software Innovations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Augmentation Innovation Paradox: Rethinking Validation in Generative AI-Driven Open Innovation

Kaveh Abhari, Aida Sanatizadeh, Morteza Safaei Pour
ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa)
Open Source Software Innovations
article

Augmentation Innovation Paradox: Rethinking Validation in Generative AI-Driven Open Innovation

Kaveh Abhari, Aida Sanatizadeh, Morteza Safaei Pour
article en

Abstract

Open innovation is undergoing a fundamental transformation with the rise of artificial intelligence, particularly through the emergence of augmented innovation, characterized by the collaborative interplay between human creativity and generative AI. This study investigates a central tension in this shift: the ideation–validation paradox. While generative AI (GenAI) significantly accelerates the process of idea generation, it simultaneously introduces new complexities around validating the quality, novelty, and feasibility of those ideas. To address this paradox, we propose an extended ideation framework that identifies five socio-technical mechanisms aimed at making GenAI-driven contributions more systematic, auditable, and responsible. We conclude by outlining a future research agenda to advance our understanding of human–AI collaboration within open innovation ecosystems.

ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 28%
Open Source Software Innovations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.