Algorithmic Decision-Making in Public Services: Two Empirical Cases of Algorithmic Incompetence

Algorithmic decision-making (ADM) is increasingly adopted in the public sector to support the delivery of social services. In this context, service workers play a critical role in ensuring service interactions remain human-centered, equitable, and responsive to the nuanced needs of each citizen. However, the nature of frontline work is being profoundly reshaped by ADM, along with the competencies required of service workers. This paper examines two public sector cases where ADM was introduced to facilitate service provision, but instead eroded critical competence and generated negative service experiences for many citizens. Drawing on perspectives from customer experience and employee mastery in service delivery, we examine how ADM disrupted service worker competence and the resulting implications for citizen experience. Our findings highlight the importance of preserving service workers' competence when designing and deploying ADM-driven public services.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa)
Published
2025-12-23
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Algorithmic Decision-Making in Public Services: Two Empirical Cases of Algorithmic Incompetence

Ida Someh, Tapani Rinta-Kahila, Pouria Akbarighatar
ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Algorithmic Decision-Making in Public Services: Two Empirical Cases of Algorithmic Incompetence

Ida Someh, Tapani Rinta-Kahila, Pouria Akbarighatar
article en

Abstract

Algorithmic decision-making (ADM) is increasingly adopted in the public sector to support the delivery of social services. In this context, service workers play a critical role in ensuring service interactions remain human-centered, equitable, and responsive to the nuanced needs of each citizen. However, the nature of frontline work is being profoundly reshaped by ADM, along with the competencies required of service workers. This paper examines two public sector cases where ADM was introduced to facilitate service provision, but instead eroded critical competence and generated negative service experiences for many citizens. Drawing on perspectives from customer experience and employee mastery in service delivery, we examine how ADM disrupted service worker competence and the resulting implications for citizen experience. Our findings highlight the importance of preserving service workers' competence when designing and deploying ADM-driven public services.

ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Algorithmic Decision-Making in Public Services: Two Empirical Cases of Algorithmic Incompetence — Ida Someh, Tapani Rinta-Kahila, et al. · ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS