Agility Under Fire: Barriers to Off-the-Shelf AI Adaptation

This study examines how off-the-shelf AI affects organizational agility in Germany’s Cooperative Financial Network. Drawing on 22 interviews across banks, service providers, and consultants and using a Gioia approach, we surface a dual lock-in: hyperscalers anchor a standardized core while a centralized integrator enforces uniform roadmaps and update cycles. Together with technological rigidity, layered bureaucracy, and data-governance frictions, this limits local sensing, rapid experimentation, and reconfiguration. Our contribution is conceptual: based on qualitative analysis, we integrate these empirically derived concepts into a framework that explains mechanisms and boundary conditions under which standardization constrains agility. We also outline design principles for a hybrid architecture, standardized backbone plus modular extensions, paired with dual governance and data contracts. The paper refines the agility-standardization debate and offers actionable guidance for financial networks seeking scale efficiency and organizational agility.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa)
Published
2025-12-23
Primary Topic
Digital Platforms and Economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Agility Under Fire: Barriers to Off-the-Shelf AI Adaptation

Maurice Wendt
ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa)
Digital Platforms and Economics
article

Agility Under Fire: Barriers to Off-the-Shelf AI Adaptation

Maurice Wendt
article en

Abstract

This study examines how off-the-shelf AI affects organizational agility in Germany’s Cooperative Financial Network. Drawing on 22 interviews across banks, service providers, and consultants and using a Gioia approach, we surface a dual lock-in: hyperscalers anchor a standardized core while a centralized integrator enforces uniform roadmaps and update cycles. Together with technological rigidity, layered bureaucracy, and data-governance frictions, this limits local sensing, rapid experimentation, and reconfiguration. Our contribution is conceptual: based on qualitative analysis, we integrate these empirically derived concepts into a framework that explains mechanisms and boundary conditions under which standardization constrains agility. We also outline design principles for a hybrid architecture, standardized backbone plus modular extensions, paired with dual governance and data contracts. The paper refines the agility-standardization debate and offers actionable guidance for financial networks seeking scale efficiency and organizational agility.

ScholarSpace (University of Hawaii at Manoa)
Openalex Percentile: Top 25%
Digital Platforms and Economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.